February 9, 2008
David Shuster's Whore-i-ble Suspension (updated)
David Shuster's been suspended from MSNBC from using a vulgar but common street term, "pimping", to describe how Clinton's campaign was using Chelsea to promote her mother. Tom Maguire reminds us that Shuster was caught numerous times -- notably in the Libby case -- simply making up news with no response by MSNBC.
Extreme Mortman reminds us that Shuster's colleague at MSNBC, Keith Olbermann, used the term to describe General Petraeus' supporter, President Bush:
Keith Olbermann, 9/20/07: "And in pimping General David Petraeus and in the violation of everything this country has been assiduously and vigilantly against for 220 years, you have tried to blur the gleaming radioactive demarcation between the military and the political, and to portray your party as the one associated with the military, and your opponents as the ones somehow antithetical to it."[/quote]
The lesson is you can lie all you want at MSNBC. You can call the President a pimp. But you better not use that term in describing the actions of Chelsea Clinton even if it's the truth.
Update -- Jack Kemp (not the politician) writes:
Perhaps the Clintons forgot about the 2004 Democratic fundraiser at Radio City in New York where top politicians of their party (John Kerry and John Edwards included) sat and laughed as Whoopie Goldberg made vulgar remarks about President Bush, playing on his last name. It seems that top Democratic politicians in attendance didn't mind the coarsening the culture when others are involved, but have no concept or belief that crude remarks, when tolerated in public cultural and media circles, blowback on themselves. After all, a reporter living in an environment of rap music, value free education, "deconstructed" history and contempt for holding any institution worthy of respect, will eventually see, in their self-as-godhead ego, even the Clintons' daughter as unworthy of a minimum standard of public respect.
The Clintons' outrage about this coarsening of the culture with Chelsea -- though justified when considered by itself -- is like an drug deealer complaining that Bobby Bonds doesn't deserve his home run title or a wigmaker wanting a refund at a Dolly Parton concert because Dolly's hair presented a false image.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Corey Booker: The Attention Seeker
- Rust Belt Revival
- Birth Rates and the Future of Civilization
- Forebears of Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs
- There’s Nothing Free about ‘Free Trade’
- The U.S, Denmark, and Greenland: Irreconcilable Differences?
- Announcing the New World Trading Order
- Free Trade: Reagan and the Austrians vs. the World of Today
- Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election Screams for Department of Justice Criminal Investigation
- Too Little, Too Late
Blog Posts
- The idealized past
- Tariffs are NOT a tax
- Don’t forget Lexington and Concord
- It's too late, George
- A new lawsuit seeks to stop the open pro-Palestinian/anti-Jewish indoctrination in the Oakland Unified School District
- 'Boys will be boys' -- Musk-Navarro spat demonstrates the Trump administration is pretty ... adult
- Trump’s tariff plan is coming into focus, as all the world but for China gets relief
- Acting IRS commissioner takes a buy-out in protest because she doesn’t want DHS to know where the illegal aliens are
- 18 months to save the world
- A young boy is murdered, and the accused has a history of assaulting children—oh, and he’s also an illegal
- From Tuskegee to tap water: Why government health promises deserve scrutiny
- Rep. Ocasio-Cortez flies first class for the common man
- Do we need a national ID card?
- In the trade war, a revealing Chinese video attacks American workers
- Trump’s tariff brilliance