February 2, 2008
Obama named "Most liberal senator"
For a guy who touts himself as a uniter and not a divider, Barack Obama sure doesn't vote that way in the United States Senate.
In fact, according to the National Journal's annual rankings, Obama is the most partisan, most liberal member of the Democratic caucus:
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal's 27th annual vote ratings. The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate.So much for the "Agent of Change." Obama has demonstrated again and again that there is a troubling gap between his soothing rhetoric about bi-partisanship and unity and his actions and deeds. One begins to wonder if the media will ever knock the stars out of their eyes long enough to examine this phenomena and expose Obama for the Democratic partisan he truly is.
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., the other front-runner in the Democratic presidential race, also shifted to the left last year. She ranked as the 16th-most-liberal senator in the 2007 ratings, a computer-assisted analysis that used 99 key Senate votes, selected by NJ reporters and editors, to place every senator on a liberal-to-conservative scale in each of three issue categories. In 2006, Clinton was the 32nd-most-liberal senator.
In their yearlong race for the Democratic presidential nomination, Obama and Clinton have had strikingly similar voting records. Of the 267 measures on which both senators cast votes in 2007, the two differed on only 10. "The policy differences between Clinton and Obama are so slight they are almost nonexistent to the average voter," said Richard Lau, a Rutgers University political scientist.
Don't hold your breath though. If the media were to give the lie to Obama's rhetoric, they would destroy the most compelling part of their campaign narrative - Obama as savior, riding in on a white horse to redeem America from all the sins of the Bush Administration. So unless the candidate slips up (or more revelations surface about some of his more problematic relationships with crooked financiers like Rezko or black seperatists like the pastor of the church he attends) we are likely to be treated to glowing coverage of the candidate until the end.
HT: Rich Baehr
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Greenland: How Trump Can Deal with the Raging Danes to America's Advantage
- Greenland at the Crossroads: Why U.S. Leadership is Crucial
- How the Death Penalty Should Work
- Mr. Schumer — You Make No Sense!
- The Price of Reciprocity: Why President Trump’s Tariffs Make Strategic Sense
- The Least Dangerous Branch No More
- Is Bipartisan Nationalism Possible?
- Sitting Down for the 'College Talk'
- Trump’s Tariffs Will Not Cause Inflation
- The Republican Off-Cycle Election Challenge
Blog Posts
- Smart nations lining up for tariff deals with President Trump -- and you can just tell which ones they are
- What a month of April 1968
- Florida’s opportunity to defang the property tax monster
- Iran: Israel and the USA have the same objective
- Fighting for babies while black
- America is raising feral children
- Unmanifest Destiny: Is America heading for the ash heap of history?
- A look at the vigilance we need for a safe society
- Mexico supports a terror state
- The making of an anarchist
- Tariffs: Trump, Nancy, and the chatbots (mostly) agree
- Tariffs force the world to bargain
- Washington Post falls for terrorist propaganda...again
- A simple question on trade
- Brace for more astroturf as pre-planned protests ‘spring to life’ this weekend