December 3, 2007
UK 12 year olds get morning after pill without parents' knowledge
The Daily Mail reports that girls as young as 12 years old are being given morning-after contraceptive pills at public expense, without informing their parents.
Under a controversial Government scheme to cut teenage pregnancies, youngsters are asked only basic questions in a brief consultation with a pharmacist. [....]The Family Education Trust, which produced the report, says the policy is having no effect on pregnancy rates and is actually increasing promiscuity, putting girls at greater risk of sexually transmitted diseases.Campaigner Sue Axon said last night: "I know of a 14-year-old whose boyfriend tried to talk her into having sex by saying he would take her for the morning-after pill."Young boys think they have a licence to do whatever they want because of this."Disclosures under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that 84 per cent of England's 152 NHS trusts allow pharmacies like Boots to hand out the morning-after pill to girls under 16.Some set lower age limits of 12, 13, 14 or 15, but more than half do not.
Presumably, the pills being handed out are the type containing the progestin levonorgestrel, the most common form of "morning-after" contraception. This is a very powerful dose of hormones issued to a child barely into puberty in some cases.
Widespread easy availability of the pills logically would encourage underage sex in circumstances where condoms are not available, thereby promoting the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. This amounts to a vast experiment in pediatric use of the massive hormone doses, and a social experiment with the health and welfare of Britain's pubescent girls.
Hat tip: Joseph Crowley
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Left Achieves Peak Political Insanity
- Saving the Jewish People
- A Third Possible Trump Term?
- Taming the Ravenous Dragon
- Rethinking Reparations For The Living Who Deserve Them
- Smart Cities: Are They Worth It?
- Corey Booker: The Attention Seeker
- Rust Belt Revival
- Birth Rates and the Future of Civilization
- Forebears of Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs
Blog Posts
- Why Passover matters in 2025
- Lingering question: Did Ukaine have some role in an attempt to kill Trump?
- For now, California has decided not to make oil companies liable for natural disasters
- Tim Pool crowns himself the king of stupid with his backward take on Karmelo Anthony
- Florida teacher sacked after she breaks the law and uses a student’s ‘preferred name’ without parental consent
- Decoding President Trump’s praise for Democrat Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer
- Trump targets sanctuary cities: Who will be the first fool?
- If not revealed, then it never happened
- What will tariffs cost the average American family?
- Can our society regain cohesion and dignity before it's too late?
- No, a 50-percent tariff doesn’t mean a 50-percent price hike
- For Trump and Netanyahu, Iran is the issue
- Mike Huckabee: A game-changer for Israel
- Can schools force-jab children with COVID-19 shots?
- Our Lady of Perpetual Denial