« Do They Or Don't They? The NIE and Iran's Nuclear Program (extensively updated) | UN Machinations Against Israel »
December 3, 2007
As expected, Putin's Party rolls to Victory in Russia
File this one under "Least surprising news of the month."
Vladmir Putin's United Russia party amassed a huge majority in yesterday's parliamentary elections which will allow the former KGB chief to do pretty much whatever he pleases with regards to his own future.
This despite European election monitors - those few that Putin allowed to operate - who said the ballot was unfair. The sky's the limit for Putin now:
The victory paves the way for Putin to remain Russia's de facto leader even after he leaves office next spring.
On Monday, Putin described the weekend's election as a vote of confidence in him. "I headed the United Russia ticket and, of course, it's a sign of public trust," Putin said in televised remarks.
Sunday's vote followed a tense Kremlin campaign that relied on a combination of persuasion and intimidation to ensure victory for the United Russia party and for Putin, who has used a flood of oil revenues to move his country into a more assertive position on the global stage.
Luc van den Brande, who headed the delegation from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe said that officials had brought the "overwhelming influence of the president's office and the president" to bear on the campaign, and that "administrative resources" had been used to influence the outcome.
Goran Lennmarker, president of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe's parliamentary assembly, said it was "not a fair election."
First on the agenda for Putin is probably the elimination or marginalization of the opposition beginning with his fiercest critic, former chess champion Gary Kasparov. But what Putin dearly wants is to be recognized as a world leader with a say in events in the Middle East and Europe.
Given the rising oil wealth of Russia this will probably be achievable as Russia may resume its tradtional obstructionist role in the Middle East while trying to intimidate former Soviet republics into toeing Moscow's line on foreign policy.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
- This U.S. Under Trump is Strengthening Critical Minerals Sovereignty
- Upheaval and Pushback
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
Blog Posts
- One outrage after another: Europe is lost
- Judicial misconduct allegations shake legal system
- Look at all the benefits of socialism!
- French right-wing leader Le Pen banned from running for office
- The case for Alberta as the 51st US state
- Putting tariffs into perspective
- Iran’s nuclear countdown: Can Trump hold the line?
- Putin in the crosshairs
- I'm looking through you -- where did you go?
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again