December 13, 2007
Another reason to ignore the NYT: Fidell who?
Andy McCarthy shows how "fluid" is the NYT's definition of a disqualifying conflict of interest:
"Over at Bench Memos, Ed Whelan notes that while, with her usual spin on things, the NYTimes' Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse is covering the high court's national security docket, including last week's enemy combatant case, Boumediene, Greenhouse's husband, Eugene Fidell, has been busy filing amicus briefs in the case on behalf of the combatants. Fidell, as Ed recounts, is a prominent Bush critic. You would not know that from Greenhouse's reporting -- she plainly doesn't think it's worthy of mention."
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Greenland: How Trump Can Deal with the Raging Danes to America's Advantage
- Greenland at the Crossroads: Why U.S. Leadership is Crucial
- How the Death Penalty Should Work
- Mr. Schumer — You Make No Sense!
- The Price of Reciprocity: Why President Trump’s Tariffs Make Strategic Sense
- The Least Dangerous Branch No More
- Is Bipartisan Nationalism Possible?
- Sitting Down for the 'College Talk'
- Trump’s Tariffs Will Not Cause Inflation
- The Republican Off-Cycle Election Challenge
Blog Posts
- Adobe meltdown
- Smart nations lining up for tariff deals with President Trump -- and you can just tell which ones they are
- What a month of April 1968
- Tesla vandals and keeping the republic
- Florida’s opportunity to defang the property tax monster
- Iran: Israel and the USA have the same objective
- Fighting for babies while black
- America is raising feral children
- Unmanifest Destiny: Is America heading for the ash heap of history?
- A look at the vigilance we need for a safe society
- Mexico supports a terror state
- The making of an anarchist
- Tariffs: Trump, Nancy, and the chatbots (mostly) agree
- Tariffs force the world to bargain
- Washington Post falls for terrorist propaganda...again