Measuring newspapers
In a priceless admission, the President and general manager of the Washington Post reacts to some good news by saying, "but you wouldn't know that to read the newspapers."
I've been saying that for years now. Unfortunately the good news was not about Iraq or a surprisingly strong job market. The story is about some good numbers that came out of the recent Audit Bureau of Circulation report on newspaper readership. While print readership declined, sometimes sharply, (the New York Times reports a 4.5% drop in weekly circulation and a 7.6% drop in Sunday circulation) for the first time the number for online readership for more than 200 newspapers in their home markets has been included in the Audit Bureau of Circulation report.
When the online readership numbers are included, the picture looks brighter for the newspaper industry. But the president of Scarborough Reports, the company that preformed the on line analysis, reports that in the last two years their analysis of 88 major papers showed that about half had seen no significant change in combined print and online readership.
The ABC numbers are crucial in establishing how much a newspaper can charge for its advertising. This is the first time many of those papers have had an independent analysis done on online circulation. This will establish a benchmark for numbers from future periods. Without an independent confirmation of readership, advertisers are reluctant to place their ads in a publication.
Unfortunately it is still hard to sell advertising for on-line editions -and close to impossible to get readers to pay for access to your service. To date major advertisers have not considered online readership to be as valuable as print readership when devising ad campaigns.
My own thought is that many in the industry need to rethink the concept of the ad. Broadband is now available in even remote areas and younger Internet users consider their computers more akin to an on-demand TV set than an alternative to any form of print. I suspect marketing departments used to selling ad in a static medium are uncertain how to approach potential advertisers in this new, dynamic media.
Ad agencies may also have to come to grips with the idea that they may have to create video ads for customers at a much faster pace to keep their message fresh in the age of YouTube.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues