October 4, 2007
Florida Dems to Sue DNC over Ruling
The Florida Democratic party decided to defy the Democratic National Committee and hold their primary on January 29 of next year - a week before the national party's rules say they can.
As a consequence, the DNC penalized Florida by requiring candidates for president to snub the state in their campaigns while refusing to seat any Florida delegates at the Democratic Convention next summer.
It appears now that the Florida Dems are not going to take these penalties lying down:
The Democratic Party is violating the Constitution and federal law by stripping 4 million Floridians of their right to vote in the presidential primary, says a lawsuit Democratic lawmakers plan to file Thursday.Do national parties have the right to make rules and dole out penalties for violations of those rules? Those questions and others will confront the judge when he hears arguments on the case.
The national party's action is a "monumental irony" given the state's recent election history, according to a draft copy of the lawsuit.
The suit will claim the Democratic National Committee did not have the right to take away Florida's presidential delegates just because Republicans set the primary for Jan. 29 in violation of DNC rules.
The lawsuit will also say presidential candidates were pressured into boycotting the state, which takes away voters' rights to engage the candidates on issues important to them, according to a draft copy obtained Wednesday
It will name the DNC and its chairman, Howard Dean, as defendants. Sen. Bill Nelson and Rep. Alcee Hastings, both Florida Democrats who plan to file the lawsuit, will discuss it Thursday morning once it's filed.
The DNC being a private entity, it should be interesting to see how the courts rule on what amounts to a free speech issue. Can the national party make a rule that results in the non-participation of one of its subsidiaries in the presidential selection process and does that rule have to adhere to Constitutional principles? As far as I've been able to gather, experts are split on these issues with some pointing to other court cases where rules were upheld despite questions regarding constitutional protections.
At stake is 210 delegates from Florida and whether the votes of people in the January 29th primary will count for anything except a beauty contest. Other states will surely be watching the Florida case to see whether they can game the primaries to manuever their own states into a more prominent position.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
- Malicious Imbeciles
- Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
Blog Posts
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges
- How Mississippi eliminated the income tax
- The ‘agua’ battle on the border