September 25, 2007
Lebanese Parliament Adjourns Without Electing a President
Political woes continue in Lebanon as the parliament adjourned yesterday, failing to come to a consensus on who the next president should be.
House Speaker Nabih Berri adjourned Tuesday's crucial parliamentary session to elect a new president till October 23.The Lebanese president is elected by parliament. The first vote, a candidate must receive 2/3 majority in order to be victorious. But in each subsequent vote, a simple majority will elect the new leader.
"The session has been adjourned till October 23 at 10:00 am," deputy Speaker Farid Makari announced.
The announcement was made by a parliamentary official in the chamber after the bell rang three times to call the lawmakers into session. In a clear message to the opposition, MPs from the ruling majority said if there was no quorum and no vote on Tuesday, they would go ahead and elect a president with a simple majority when the next session convenes.
"We are taking part in today's session to preserve our right to vote in a subsequent session with a simple majority," MP Elias Atallah told AFP before entering parliament. "Our presence means that the first session has been convened, and the next session (there will be a vote) with a simple majority," MP Samir Frangieh said.
The situation is extremely delicate with Berri advancing a plan he hopes will be acceptable to pro-government forces that would see a consensus candidate elected. He has been negotiating on and off with Saad Hariri, head of the March 14th parliamentary forces in order to stave off disaster.
If no consensus candidate can be agreed upon and if the March 14th forces carry out their plan to elect a president anyway, it is believed that the Hezb'allah led opposition will refuse to recognize the new president and may even set up some kind of alternate government themselves. It is easy to see where such an arrangement could lead to disaster.
But the parliamentary forces have a month to work things out. It may be that the threat of civil war can overcome their differences.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Greenland: How Trump Can Deal with the Raging Danes to America's Advantage
- Greenland at the Crossroads: Why U.S. Leadership is Crucial
- How the Death Penalty Should Work
- Mr. Schumer — You Make No Sense!
- The Price of Reciprocity: Why President Trump’s Tariffs Make Strategic Sense
- The Least Dangerous Branch No More
- Is Bipartisan Nationalism Possible?
- Sitting Down for the 'College Talk'
- Trump’s Tariffs Will Not Cause Inflation
- The Republican Off-Cycle Election Challenge
Blog Posts
- Tim Walz calls Elon Musk 'a loser'
- Taming the military-transfer complex
- Could it be that Trump really knows what he’s doing?
- Tariffs: Burn it all down, rule over the ashes
- Adobe meltdown
- Smart nations lining up for tariff deals with President Trump -- and you can just tell which ones they are
- What a month of April 1968
- Tesla vandals and keeping the republic
- The Nashville Police report--sort of
- Florida’s opportunity to defang the property tax monster
- Iran: Israel and the USA have the same objective
- Fighting for babies while black
- America is raising feral children
- Unmanifest Destiny: Is America heading for the ash heap of history?
- A look at the vigilance we need for a safe society