August 22, 2007
The worms turn (updated)
The Baathists who until recently had joined forces with Al Qaeda have now switched and offered to join the Coalition forces in Iraq to fight Al Qaeda:
The leader of Iraq's banned Baath party, Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, has decided to join efforts by the Iraqi authorities to fight al-Qaeda, one of the party's former top officials, Abu Wisam al-Jashaami, told pan-Arab daily Al Hayat."Al Douri has decided to sever ties with al-Qaeda and sign up to the programme of the national resistance, which includes routing Islamist terrorists and opening up dialogue with the Baghdad government and foreign forces," al-Jashaami said.Al-Douri has decided to deal directly with US forces in Iraq, according to al-Jashaami. He figures in the 55-card deck of "most wanted" officials from the former Iraqi regime issued by the US government.
Recent weeks have seen a first step in this direction, when Baathist fighters cooperated with Iraqi government forces in hunting down al-Qaeda operatives in the volatile Diyala province and in several districts of the capital, Baghdad.
Hat tip: Laurie Mylroie
Update: John B. Dwyer writes:
While news of Baathists deciding to help coalition & Iraqi forces fight Al Qaeda is certainly encouraging, the offer by Al-Douri has a problematic proviso. I clicked on the link, 1st sentence, and read the referenced article. In it Al Douri says that he'll cooperate IF his men's safety is guaranteed and that the Iraqi army ceases attacks on his militias. I don't see how the Iraqi and US militaries, or Iraqi gov't, can satisfy these requirements.
Update: John B. Dwyer writes:
While news of Baathists deciding to help coalition & Iraqi forces fight Al Qaeda is certainly encouraging, the offer by Al-Douri has a problematic proviso. I clicked on the link, 1st sentence, and read the referenced article. In it Al Douri says that he'll cooperate IF his men's safety is guaranteed and that the Iraqi army ceases attacks on his militias. I don't see how the Iraqi and US militaries, or Iraqi gov't, can satisfy these requirements.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Katherine Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot
- A visit to DOGE
- You just might be a Democrat if ...
- Yahoo Finance writer says Trump’s tariffs will see America driving Cuban-style antique cars
- Kristi Noem and the prison cell
- Dividing the Democrats
- April 2nd: Liberation Day and Reconciliation Day don’t mix
- Red crayons and hospital gowns
- The Paris Climate Agreement was doomed from the start