July 16, 2007
How Many Politicians Does It Take To Change a Light Bulb?
During the Energy Crisis of the late 1970s, I worked in a large department store. When the price of electricity increased, we bought less of it. By the time the government did anything, we had already cut our consumption in half.
Above the sales floor were large banks of lights. Each bank had four fixtures, each with two fluorescent bulbs. First we disconnected two fixtures in each bank and replaced them with ceiling tile. When the price of electricity continued to rise, we disconnected one of the two remaining fixtures in each bank. We reduced our overhead lighting to one quarter of what it had been and found that we still had plenty of light.
We also purchased “energy-efficient” light bulbs and replaced the old bulbs as they burned out. When we had replaced almost all of the old bulbs, the City announced a rebate program that would pay most of the cost of replacing old bulbs with “energy-efficient” ones, but we could find only a few old bulbs out of the many hundreds we had.
As I remember it, the City would give us $1.00 for each “energy-efficient” bulb we purchased for $1.06. The catch was that we had to use them to replace bulbs we had already replaced, and the only people who got them were people who were wasting electricity. The City raises rates on people who conserve energy on their own and gives money away to people who waste energy. The great liberals who run the government would have bought light bulbs for a profitable department store chain, but didn’t because the chain had conserved energy.
The corporate office also sent engineers to all the stores to install microprocessors on their air conditioning systems to cycle them on and off in a more efficient manner, but I don’t think the City ever came by with microprocessor subsidies. I do know that the City did eventually pay people to buy politically correct air conditioners, prompting one councilman to complain about “socialized air conditioning.”
Anyway, please excuse me if I display impatience when a politician acts as if he’s the only who ever thought of using “energy-efficient” light bulbs.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Katherine Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot
- A visit to DOGE
- You just might be a Democrat if ...
- Yahoo Finance writer says Trump’s tariffs will see America driving Cuban-style antique cars
- Kristi Noem and the prison cell
- Dividing the Democrats
- April 2nd: Liberation Day and Reconciliation Day don’t mix