GOP Lags in Fundraising, Internet Savvy
If Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee (better than 50-50 at this point) ,she has already announced she will not accept the $75 million federal payment, and raise money independently for the general election. She might be able to raise $500 million or more. As Patrick Ruffini points out, the GOP is not in the same league as far as internet fundraising at this point, and would likely be swamped in the money raising race by her campaign or that of any other Democrat.
Democrats picked up 6 Governors chairs in 2006. They now control Ohio, for instance, a key battleground state, and Colorado, another. Send a few hundred ACORN folks in to fudge phony registrations in these states while Governors look the other way at the fraud right under their noses, overwhelm the states with ads, and there goes 20 Electoral votes in Ohio, and 9 in Colorado. Enough for Clinton to win if nothing else changes (281-257 for Democrats in Electoral College in that case).
But the GOP is also vulnerable in Arkansas (6), West Virginia (5), Missouri (11), New Mexico (5), Nevada (5), Virginia (13) and Iowa (7) as well, i think, all states Bush won in in 2004 - 52 more Electoral votes that could switch sides. And Florida (25) is always a horse race. Can any Republican hold many of these states, and also challenge the Democrats in Pennsylvania (21), New Jersey (15), Michigan (18), Wisconsin (10) and Minnesota (10)? That is where Rudy Giuliani's electability issue comes into play. The GOP will need to turn a few blue (Kerry) states to balance losses in a few states Bush won in 2000 and 2004 which may vote Democratic in 2008.
And it needs to get its fundraising machine revved up and quickly. It is possible that once a GOP nominee is determined, that person will become the face of the Party, and not George Bush. That may help awaken awaken slumbering or in hiding GOP voters, and help the fundraising side as well. But as Ruffini points out, the GOP needs to be competitive in all the current pathways to money raising, and that is not the case today.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
- This U.S. Under Trump is Strengthening Critical Minerals Sovereignty
- Upheaval and Pushback
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
Blog Posts
- French right-wing leader Le Pen banned from running for office
- The case for Alberta as the 51st US state
- Putting tariffs into perspective
- Iran’s nuclear countdown: Can Trump hold the line?
- Putin in the crosshairs
- I'm looking through you -- where did you go?
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency
- Bob Lighthizer’s case for tariffs