June 1, 2007
Debating immigration - why not?
Wow, Fred Thompson vs. Ted Kennedy or even Mrs. Bill Clinton. And, as someone suggested earlier today, an "undercard" with Laura Ingraham vs. Tamar Jacoby. Or Giuliani vs. Obama? Or Romney vs. Edwards? Or maybe a couple of "top guns" from the Center for Immigration Studies" vs. a couple of their counterparts from the National Council of La Raza? Or a match between Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation and his counterpart from the Urban Institute? While we're at, why not Rush Limbaugh vs. Al Franken? Instead of Rush, I was going to suggest Mark Levin, but then I'd actually feel sympathy for Franken.
That would be better than, but not by much, the challenge made by National Review's editors to the Wall Street Journal's editorial board.
Could this lead to some REAL presidential debates? I sure hope so. And why isn't PBS chomping at the bit urging all of this on? What is PBS doing with our taxes? You mean they're letting Bill Moyers do another documentary? Or what about C-SPAN? I'd think Brian Lamb, too, would be chomping at the bit to get this arranged.
With some planning, this could be better than a Super Bowl weekend, e.g., have a couple of early rounds on Friday evening and work "up" on Saturday and Sunday. Frank Luntz could do some of his focus groups, and score each debate, e.g., hold a dozen or so all around the nation. For the grand finale, there could be a round table discussion between President Bush on one side of a large conference table with Secretary Chertoff Senators Kennedy and McCain and other members of the "secret cabal." On the other side of the table, the three or four highest rated talk show hosts three or four TV "hosts" could "interview" the President's side.
I started this off lightheartedly, but this could work. And who knows, perhaps this could be a new way of settling contentious issues such as global warming or abortion. If there can be a National Spelling Bee, why not a National Debate on Immigration and the Future of America?
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction