May 22, 2007
Why assume they even want citizenship?
I find my self puzzled by the argument over immigration. Everyone talks of "citizenship" and "a path to citizenship" for illegals (excuse me, "undocumented") now in the country. But I have nowhere seen a responsible study which makes clear that the great majority of the illegals indeed desire citizenship.
If I were one of them at the moment, I would think that access to jobs, free healthcare, free schooling for children, etc., without the burdens of citizenship would be very attractive. The fact that so many of the Mexican illegals make a spectacular display of their allegiance to their home country in demonstrations, sports events, etc., and that the revanchist, racist effusions of MECHa and La Raza continue to be popular, would seem to be evidence that a great many Mexicans are not interested in citizenship.
I see no prima facie evidence that our Mexican guests really desire, above all, American citizenship. I am aware that many Mexicans here have volunteered for the US armed forces, and that is encouraging. I am also confident that few Mexicans want to blow up the US, and that is encouraging. But I am puzzled that, on the alleged question at issue, citizenship, everyone seems to be talking with no evidence. I would think that it is time to find out the truth of the matter.
Donald C. Baker
Thomas Lifson adds:
Regardless of the desires of those who have arriuved here without our permission, I also wonder why we should offer citizenship. If it is true that the economy needs their labor, why not just go with work visas?
Like many Americans I am highly offended at the devaluation of citizenship inherent in offering it those who have violated our rules. There may be practical and humanitarian reasons to allow continued residence, but why even consider citizenship, other than to engineer the electorate to the advantage of one party?
Thomas Lifson adds:
Regardless of the desires of those who have arriuved here without our permission, I also wonder why we should offer citizenship. If it is true that the economy needs their labor, why not just go with work visas?
Like many Americans I am highly offended at the devaluation of citizenship inherent in offering it those who have violated our rules. There may be practical and humanitarian reasons to allow continued residence, but why even consider citizenship, other than to engineer the electorate to the advantage of one party?
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction