May 15, 2007
Hillary and Univision
Blogger Clemensando, who covers Hispanic media, is fairly confident that Haim Saban's investment in Univision will not influence its coverage of the election to favor Hillary, as I fear:
...it is the flip question asked by some liberals during the long reign of Univision's former board chairman, CEO and controlling shareholder A. Jerrold ("Jerry") Perenchio who is a major donor to the Republican Party and affiliated causes such as the Swift Boat Veterans Campaign.Did Perenchio's command of the company result in coverage tilted in favor of the Bush Administration? I saw no evidence of that over the course of many years. And, in fact, it was under Perenchio's ownership that the nationally syndicated Univision Radio disc jockey, Eddie 'Piolín' Sotelo, vociferously called for Hispanic immigrants to march in the street. Not exactly the mainstream Republican party line. [....]... given how Univision managed to maintain its editorial independence during the long absolutist reign of major Republican donor Jerry Perenchio I believe it is a safe bet to think the same will be true under the partial ownership of major Democratic donor Haim Saban. And I base my belief on close observations made over the years as a reporter covering the network for various trade publications.
I greatly appreciate the civility and thoughtfulness of this post, but respectfully disagree. I think you have to look at the degrees of separation and the intensity level of the support. Did Perenchio gush over Bush as Saban has over Hillary? Was Perenchio the largest funder of the GOP, as Saban is for the Democratic Party? Saban gave a huge amount of money to the Brookings Institution - a liberal think tank. He clearly did this because of a desire to, at the very least, influence public discussion of our foreign policy. Would he be tempted to flex his muscles over at Univision to also influence public discussion?
We also live in feverish, more partisan times. Univiison may have engaged in citizenship drives before, but the intensity seems greater now than ever before. Again, it is a matter of degree.
Of course, time will tell, and I suspect Clemensando will be on top of the question and will call the shots as he sees them. I could not ask for more.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Truth About Trump’s Tariff Revisions … It’s All About 'The Art of the Deal'
- Remember, MAGA: This is No Time to Go Wobbly
- The Hill of Lies
- Trump’s Tariff Play: The Art of the Economic Reset
- Tax Cuts (and Tariffs) Need Not Be Paid For
- Tune Out the Media for What Matters
- Trump’s Tariffs Tackle Clinton’s China Carnage
- The Fruits of Trump’s Audacious Policies
- Will Trump’s Tariff Ambition Strangle MAGA in the Cradle?
- Navarro Tariffs are Too High
Blog Posts
- Maybe it's time to clean up the 25th
- Rage as a way of life
- An interesting challenge on tariff logic from former Reagan budget director, David Stockman
- Billionaire heiress Rep. Sara Jacobs makes a fool of herself in bid to defund DOGE
- Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth understand that war is about winning while minimizing American casualties
- From hero to zero in 75 days?
- Again, the times that try men's souls
- How is the U.S. the bad guy on tariffs?
- An easy explanation of this tariff tiff
- A tribute to Val Kilmer
- ‘Free trade’ is not as great as you think it is
- Trump’s tariff idea is consistent with every human society ever
- Jasmine Dixiecrat
- RFK Jr. wants scientific analysis of autism, but maybe society is the problem
- As the House is about to grill Biden’s doctor, Biden’s chief of staff admits the truth: They always knew