Oxfam's folly

According to the tearful plea from Oxfam - a poverty and "injustice" advocacy group - international aid should be given to Palestinians no matter what. As per the Guardian report , Oxfam's position is that "International aid should be provided impartially on the basis of need, not as a political tool to change the policies of a government." In other words, he who pays the musicians should have no say over the tune.

Oxfamers must be living on Venus, to judge by disconnect between their logic, and that of the normal humans. Else, their concern with Palestinian "poverty" (Palestinians are not poor, their food being supplied for free by the UN, their energy needs by Israel) would have caused them to ask a simple question: why are Palestinians "poor"? Are they "poor" trough necessity, or by choice?

The latter is clearly the case. If Palestinians did not choose to be "poor," they certainly did choose to be violent (both by rocketing Israel, by attempting new terror acts, and by showing their grass-root support for that cause of action through democratically electing terrorist Hamas into power).

Had they chosen to be peaceful, they would have been able to build their economy, living like all other normal peoples do, and would no longer be "poor." Reject violence - and you will do well. That's the advice Oxfam should be giving the Palestinians, rather than argue their thugdom's entitlement to the free world's money.
If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
Kristi Noem and the prison cell
Snow White: a bomb for the ages

Last 7 Days

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Righteous Attacks Bringing the Left to Heel
Is Dem Defector Lindy Li A Deep State Double Agent?
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Think USAID was bad? You ain't seen nothin' yet.