March 18, 2007
Culture of Corruption
It involves a key Democratic Congressman and an important grand jury in the District of Columbia, but you won't find anything current about it in the Washington Post. Wonder why? From the Times West Virginian:
FAIRMONT - Rep. Alan Mollohan's finances are the target of a grand jury investigation that will look at whether the veteran congressman failed to disclose source of income, The Dominion Post reported.Witnesses have been subpoenaed by the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia to appear before the grand jury on April 3, the newspaper said in Saturday's editions, citing sources close to the investigation. The newspaper said it had agreed to withhold the sources' identities.Mollohan, who has denied any wrongdoing, said he was unaware of the grand jury investigation and had not been subpoenaed."If it's true, then you know it and I don't," the West Virginia Democrat told the newspaper Friday.On Saturday, Mollohan spokesman Gerry Griffith called the story an "unsubstantiated" one."In fact, the newspaper that originated it tried to claim that Mr. Mollohan himself had received a subpoena, which is incorrect," Griffith said."They need to be cautious when they run unsubstantiated stories."Channing Phillips, spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in the District of Columbia, said the agency could not comment."Pursuant to department policy and grand jury secrecy rules, we cannot comment on such matters," Phillips said Friday.A conservative group, the National Legal and Policy Center, has alleged that Mollohan has undervalued his assets in annual financial disclosure reports.The Justice Department has been investigating whether Mollohan has benefited from directing federal funds to nonprofit groups he helped start.At issue is at least $202 million of federal funding that Mollohan has steered to five nonprofit groups in his district - with much of the money going to organizations run by people who contribute to the lawmaker's campaigns.Mollohan and a political action committee he controls have received more than $146,000 in the past 10 years from donors affiliated with these nonprofits.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Danes and the Greenlanders: How They See Trump's America
- The USAID Case: Judge Amir Ali’s $2 Billion Defiance Escalates
- Terrifying Tariffs: Tax Policy as Back-Door Foreign Aid
- Dr. Marty Makary’s ‘Blind Spots’ Book Is At Odds With Established Findings
- Reforming the Kennedy Center
- Is ActBlue a Criminal Enterprise?
- America’s New Tough Love Foreign Policy
- Democrats Stand for Ukraine but Sit for America
- A Friend for Trump in Italy
- Trump’s Digital Fort Knox: Bitcoin, the Dollar, and America’s Financial Future
Blog Posts
- After blowing $9 billion on 'free' health care for illegals, California's Gov. Gavin Newsom asks for a bailout
- Trump throws down the gauntlet to the out-of-control federal district court judges *UPDATED*
- Ronald Reagan also had a slow economic start
- Getting the left out of the political wilderness
- Oregon selects a trans-turtle and a trans-meteor to sit on a ‘mental health advisory board’
- Fly the DEI skies...and hope that you land safely
- This 70-year-old woman is serving 9 years in prison
- Stacey Abrams really, really, wants 'her' $2 billion from Biden's EPA slush fund
- The (un)masked magician’s apprentice
- Schumer’s attempted shutdown will backfire bigly
- The Democrats are so passionate ...
- Biden and the U.S. Steel case
- Jay Bhattacharya's promise on vaccine safety
- MAGA moon over Greenland?
- Trump must designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization