February 21, 2007
Responding to Iran's "offer"
I find the official American reaction to Iran's president's "offer" rather less than adequate. Ahmadinejad said Iran would "stop the enrichment program if other nuclear powers were willing to do the same." The response from the White House:
"Do you believe that's a serious offer?" White House spokesman Tony Snow said when asked about Ahmadinejad's comments," the same report tells us.
Of course it isn't. But let's pause for a second and think of what Ahmadinejad is telling us. Doesn't he say in effect "Iran is on the par with other nuclear powers; the rules that Iran is bound by, apply equally to the nuclear powers, too"?
But this notion is counter to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. That treaty creates the two-tier system: there are legitimately nuclear-armed countries, and there are other, non-nuclear countries, for whom it is not OK to have nuclear weapons.
In putting forth equality between the two, Ahmadinejad demonstrates that in his mind, the nuclear non-proliferation treaty is no longer binding.
This is serious business, and deserves more than a brusque dismissal. A de-facto declaration by any head of state that he does not see his country as bound by the nuclear non-proliferation treaty is a cause for alarm - especially if that country is ruled by people with such warped, off-the-wall perception of reality as that of the ayatollahs.
Update:
Reader Krooshy Afshar writes:
But if you read all along Iran is saying that it is pursuing a peaceful nuclear program for energy uses and also To this date IAEA has found no diversion so what Iran is offering is if you say we can not have peaceful nuclear program.
Like we are according to NPT are entitle to then you must stop yours and that completely make sense since this is not about the military Nuclear program that 5 declared nuclear powers according to the NPT agreement they are also a signatory of and according to article 4 of that they are suppose to reduce their arsenal which they have not in 40 years since NPT
Update:
Reader Krooshy Afshar writes:
Ok Vel you need more thinking if Iran was admitting it is trying to make a nuke Bomb your argument make sense.
But if you read all along Iran is saying that it is pursuing a peaceful nuclear program for energy uses and also To this date IAEA has found no diversion so what Iran is offering is if you say we can not have peaceful nuclear program.
Like we are according to NPT are entitle to then you must stop yours and that completely make sense since this is not about the military Nuclear program that 5 declared nuclear powers according to the NPT agreement they are also a signatory of and according to article 4 of that they are suppose to reduce their arsenal which they have not in 40 years since NPT
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
- This U.S. Under Trump is Strengthening Critical Minerals Sovereignty
- Upheaval and Pushback
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
Blog Posts
- Iran’s nuclear countdown: Can Trump hold the line?
- Putin in the crosshairs
- I'm looking through you -- where did you go?
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency
- Bob Lighthizer’s case for tariffs
- An eye for an eye, an order for order
- Peace on the Dnieper?
- Tesla protestor banner: 'Burn a Tesla, save democracy'