December 12, 2006
Charges detailed against Carter book
The Emory Wheel, student-run newspaper at Emory University, details serious accusations against Jimmy Carter's controversial new book made by Emory Professor Kenneth Stein, who resigned last week from his post at The Carter Center to protest its inaccuracies.
Rachel Zelkowitz writes of Stein's views:
There are other inaccuracies cited in the story, as well. Combined with the other charges of plagiarism and worse, the credibility of this book has taken some serious blows....the former president's first error concerns United Nations Security Council Resolution 242. Signed in November 1967, the agreement has been used as the basis for all subsequent Arab-Israeli negotiations.
In his book, Carter writes that the resolution says, "Israel must withdraw from occupied territories" it acquired by force during the Six-Day War in 1967 between Israel and Egypt, Jordan and Syria.
But the word "must" never appears in the actual U.N. resolution text.
Stein argued that each word in the resolution was carefully chosen and by inserting the word "must," Carter changed the implications of this key resolution.
Stein said Carter makes a second "inexcusable" error in describing the impact of the 1978 Camp David Accords, which details how Egypt and Israel would normalize relations.
Carter writes that the accords called for "the dismantling of [Israeli] settlements on Egyptian land." But the accords never actually refer to the settlements. In fact, the Israeli leader at the time, Menachem Begin, was so opposed to discussing the issue that he wouldn't have signed any document mentioning them, Stein said.
Stein's third objection to Carter's book is that the former president de-emphasizes the importance of U.N. Resolution 242, he said.
This resolution called for the "territorial integrity, political sovereignty and independence of all states in the region." By emphasizing subsequent resolutions over 242, Stein said, Carter suggests that a solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict could be imposed on the states by an outside party. That would change the central premise of all Arab-Israeli negotiations, Stein said.
"As soon as [Carter] put the idea out there, he made it an issue of debate," Stein said.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Russia Tariff Canard
- When The Government Brutalizes Children
- Trump’s Global Bunker Buster Day
- Phone-Free Schools: Banning Phones to Protect Schoolchildren
- Out-of-Control Courts
- ‘Democracy,’ Establishment Style
- The Truth About Trump’s Tariff Revisions … It’s All About 'The Art of the Deal'
- Remember, MAGA: This is No Time to Go Wobbly
- The Hill of Lies
- Trump’s Tariff Play: The Art of the Economic Reset
Blog Posts
- Democrats are avoiding Obama like a bad smell
- Axios and the Democrats whine about a female Navy officer losing her job, but leave out the very important why
- Nashville PD on Covenant school shooter: All that talk about wanting to kill ‘white’ kids isn’t about race, but notoriety
- At CU Boulder, Hamas supporters were unceremoniously tossed from a classroom
- Rep. Jasmine Crockett calls on illegals to pick her cotton because 'we done picking cotton'
- Two…men…advance to women’s pool championship
- Let’s talk about the economic collapse and recession that aren’t happening
- Where were all the ‘protesters’ during Biden’s years in office?
- Progressivism is an auto-immune disease
- Time to tariff up: Stop funding our own collapse
- Major victory from SCOTUS in Trump deportation case
- Mississippi on the move
- We called him ‘Daniel el travieso’
- The Supreme Court affirms Justice Boasberg lacked jurisdiction over Trump’s deportation decision under the Alien Enemies Act
- DOGE spirit moves downstream -- to new U.S. Attorney who vows to probe the billions lost to L.A.'s homeless industrial complex