Kofi's snap judgment
On what possible basis can Annan make this snap assertion? The Secretary General is now claiming that the unfortunate killing of UN personnel by the Israeli Defense Forces during its maneuvers against Hezbollah terrorists were the result of "deliberate" targeting. He has called for an inquiry into what he called Israel's "apparently deliberate targeting " of the UN observer force.
In the fog of war accidents inevitably happen and that Israel has already deeply apologized for this accident. Hezbollah has a tactic of locating its forces near UNIFIL and other UN outposts (as well as civilian outposts) to discourage Israeli attacks, since Israel, unlike Hezbollhah, tries to spare the lives of innocents.
Annan seems more exercised by this accident than the truly deliberate kidnapping and killing of Israeli soldiers and the indiscriminate mass rocket attacks Israel is being forced to endure because the UN was pusillanimous in refusing to enforce its resolutions regarding terror forces in Southern Lebanon.
Annan, as the world's chief diplomat, is charged with the responsibility of good judgment and temperate, well—considered remarks. He seems to have a penchant for violating this obligation when it comes to issues involving Israel. He also was quick to claim a few weeks ago that Israeli shelling caused the deaths of Palestinians on a Gaza beach.
He made that claim immediately after the event. Subsequent events, of course, proved him wrong. Annan does not seem capable of learning from his own mistakes. After all, his own failures led to the Rwandan genocide but that did not motivate him to act to stop the later genocide in Yugoslavia or the current one in Sudan or the anticipated one in the state of Israel.
Incidentally, the UNIFIL French commander who is backing up Annan was guilty of trying to hide UNIFIL incompetence or complicity involving the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers.
Mr. Annan, who according to diplomats was accompanied by the U.N. peacekeeping chief, Undersecretary—General Jean Marie Guehenno, as he released the statement, believes he could not promote placing an international force in southern Lebanon if he does not appear to support his troops, according to a source familiar with yesterday's statement.
Mr. Guehenno had a long dispute with Israel several years ago, when he had insisted that UNIFIL did not possess a videocassette depicting the Hezbollah kidnapping of Israeli soldiers. The cassette, videotaped by UNIFIL troops, eventually surfaced and the U.N. was forced to apologize and launch an internal investigation.
Ed Lasky 7 26 06
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Not in Kansas Any More
- Democrats Dying on the Most Desolate Hills
- If She’s an Astronaut … I’m a Jet Fighter Pilot
- Is the Jihadist Trojan Horse Winning?
- Who Has the Best American Autobiography?
- This Easter, Let Us Renew Our Faith
- Is it Time to Ignore the Judiciary?
- Higher Ed is Fighting Back!
- Easter: the Resurrection of Jesus Transformed the World Forever
- Trump’s vision for technological greatness
Blog Posts
- Hillary ‘the Russia Hoaxer’ Clinton wants to imprison people for ‘propaganda’
- Rep. Jamie Raskin threatens foreign leaders who cooperate with President Trump with repercussions, 'when we come back to power — and we will'
- Maybe we need more living versions of “Hillbilly Funerals”
- A female fencer's courage is partly rewarded
- Democrats' Cloward-Piven default
- A New Mexico judge resigned over allegations that he kept a Tren de Aragua member in his home
- The Pope’s death is leading to yet more anti-Israel and anti-Trump propaganda
- Ivy League college invites antisemitic rapper onto campus
- Pope Francis, RIP
- It’s not really about Abrego Garcia
- When Oregon became Bart Jason
- Post-election lawfare; legislating from the bench
- Oregon pushes trans track
- The Starliner: worse than we thought
- Professional sports leagues push gun control