Human Rights Watch watch

By

Kenneth Roth, the executive director of Soros—funded Human Rights Watch, is exposed in an editorial of the New York Sun, contradicting other key members of his organization, in order to justify his one—sided condemnation of Israel in the current crisis in Lebanon.

Mr. Roth, who says he is descended from a Jewish refugee from Nazism, is also rather cavalier when it comes to Judaism's scripture:

Mr. Roth concludes his letter with a slur on the Jewish religion itself that is breathtaking in its ignorance."An eye for an eye — or more accurately in this case twenty eyes for an eye — may have been the morality of some more primitive moment," Mr. Roth writes. The reference is to the phrase "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," found in Exodus 21, in Deuteronomy 19, and Leviticus, Chapter 24. The sages have long made clear that this referred to monetary compensation, as the Talmud points out in Baba Kamma 84a. To suggest that Judaism is a "primitive" religion incompatible with contemporary morality is to engage in supersessionism, the de—legitimization of Judaism, the basis of much anti—Semitism.Mr. Roth concludes his letter with a slur on the Jewish religion itself that is breathtaking in its ignorance."An eye for an eye — or more accurately in this case twenty eyes for an eye — may have been the morality of some more primitive moment," Mr. Roth writes. The reference is to the phrase "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," found in Exodus 21, in Deuteronomy 19, and Leviticus, Chapter 24. The sages have long made clear that this referred to monetary compensation, as the Talmud points out in Baba Kamma 84a. To suggest that Judaism is a "primitive" religion incompatible with contemporary morality is to engage in supersessionism, the de—legitimization of Judaism, the basis of much anti—Semitism.

Ed Lasky 7 31 06

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com