Curse and effect
Wednesday the Seattle Times ran a letter—to—the—editor that stated
"We need to weed out these neocons and their globalist conspirators!" [emphasis added]
And the Wednesday Seattle Times letter headlined:
"Eradicate those who have put us in the Middle East"
Now on Saturday the Seattle Times front page says:
"Hatred hits home: 6 shot at Jewish office downtown"
Imagine if someone on FOX news had called for terrorists to "be eradicated", and then a mosque was firebombed? But a newspaper headlining and publishing hatred, well they get a pass.
Remember, Bill Keller of the New York Times has informed us that the press is ultimate authority on what is in the public interest, right? And when blogger Jim Miller of Sound Politics chastised Seattle Times Editor Jim Vesely for the headline (a day before the shooting), Vesely haughtily replied:
"No thanks, I'll stick with our earlier decision and with the headline, the dictionaries agree with our use of the words."
Go look up the word "clueless" in one of those dictionaries, and you'll probably find a picture of the Seattle Times there now.
No, this is probably not a case of literal cause—and—effect, but the constant mantra of self—blame and self—hate we allow to be trumpeted has consequences, and this type of violent behavior is one of them. Yes, indeed "Hatred hits home...", and the press have been getting away with the incitement of it for too long!
When Mr. Vesely inevitably defends his paper's right (no duty!) to publish controversial opinions, I would like to ask him if he would have published a letter that demanded: "We need to weed out these Islamists and their terrorist conspirators!"?
And would he have headlined it: "Eradicate those who threaten us in the Middle East!"? No, I don't think so, either.
Dave in Seattle 7 29 06
Update:
A quote from the piece:
"When Mr. Vesely inevitably defends his paper's right (no duty!) to publish controversial opinions, I would like to ask him if he would have published a letter that demanded: 'We need to weed out these Islamists and their terrorist conspirators!'"
Yes, it's his duty to publish controversial opinions. Did Mr. Vesely print the Mohammed cartoons?
Sean Roper
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Fruits of Trump’s Audacious Policies
- Will Trump’s Tariff Ambition Strangle MAGA in the Cradle?
- Navarro Tariffs are Too High
- Will Musk’s Nightmare Come True?
- From Mayberry to Mayhem
- We Didn’t Start the Trade War—We’ve Just Finally Joined It
- Greenland: How Trump Can Deal with the Raging Danes to America's Advantage
- Greenland at the Crossroads: Why U.S. Leadership is Crucial
- How the Death Penalty Should Work
- Mr. Schumer — You Make No Sense!
Blog Posts
- An interesting challenge on tariff logic from former Reagan budget director, David Stockman
- Billionaire heiress Rep. Sara Jacobs makes a fool of herself in bid to defund DOGE
- Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth understand that war is about winning while minimizing American casualties
- From hero to zero in 75 days?
- Again, the times that try men's souls
- How is the U.S. the bad guy on tariffs?
- An easy explanation of this tariff tiff
- A tribute to Val Kilmer
- ‘Free trade’ is not as great as you think it is
- Trump’s tariff idea is consistent with every human society ever
- Jasmine Dixiecrat
- RFK Jr. wants scientific analysis of autism, but maybe society is the problem
- As the House is about to grill Biden’s doctor, Biden’s chief of staff admits the truth: They always knew
- California: Second Amendment foot dragging
- DOGE: the Baier interview