Mad and dangerous

By

In a speech yesterday, Gordon Brown — the man most likely to succeed Tony Blair as Prime Minister — stated his commitment to renewing Britain's nuclear arsenal when the current Trident system comes to the end of its operational life in 2024. Brown's position, however, was met with anger and indignation in some quarters of the Labour Party. According to the UK Guardian:

Mr Brown's move will upset many on the Labour left, and may add to the moves within the party to put a candidate up against him if there are elections either this year or next for the leadership.

So at the time when countries such as North Korea and Iran are about to acquire nuclear weapons some leftwing members of the ruling party would like Britain to throw away her own.

Kate Hudson, chairwoman of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, even went so far as to say:

When we face no nuclear threat, to decide on a new Trident replacement is beginning a new nuclear arms race.

Contravening all common sense and denying the obvious, the left continually offers evidence of how mad and dangerous they really are.

Vasko Kohlmayer    6 22 06

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.

Last 7 Days

Righteous Attacks Bringing the Left to Heel
Is Dem Defector Lindy Li A Deep State Double Agent?
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Think USAID was bad? You ain't seen nothin' yet.
The Supreme Court Has Long Held That The Alien Enemies Act Gives The President Plenary Power