Good to know
Abu Musab al—Zarqawi released an infomercial on the Web on Tuesday. While tedious, as informercials tend to be, the significance of his message should not be missed. The Jordanian terrorist wants the world to know that he represents al—Qaeda in Iraq and goes out of his way to appear deferential to Osama bin Laden.
There are two reasons in a military campaign to go on the offensive. One is to move the venue of battle in the direction you wish it to go. The other is to force the enemy to fight in a place of your choosing — to force him to throw his resources in against yours.
In 1998, al—Qaeda in the person of Osama bin Laden, declared war on the United States in a written proclamation in London. We ignored that to our sorrow. Al—Qaeda became progressively more aggressive — the African embassy bombings, the attack on the USS Cole — and then finally attacked us at home on 9/11.
We are, as the president reminds us, at war with terrorists and particularly with al—Qaeda. Mr Zarqawi has kindly clarified what is at stake in Iraq as the current venue in this global war, where the freedom and happiness of the Iraqi people are at stake, but also where our war with al—Qaeda currently has its active front. This is somewhat equivalent to Guadalcanal, our first land offensive in World War II. That campaign turned out to be much more difficult than expected, resulting not only in a vicious land battle, but also in a war of attrition at sea, where several major warships — cruisers, destroyers and aircraft carriers — were sunk and several battleships severely damaged. It remains a proud battle streamer on the Marine Corps flag, famous for its never—day—die battles with the banzai—charging Japanese who were resupplied and reinforced week after week by the Tokyo Express.
The battle in Iraq is of a different type with a different timeline, but with the same purpose — defeating the enemy on ground that we have forced him to fight for. Quite why prominent retired generals want to give up while the enemy is still in the field is unclear to me. So far as I am concerned, they have yet to make their case, except to express personal pique at the Secretary of Defense for undefined discourtesies they imagine him to have made.
Abu Musab al—Zarqawi this week did us the great favor of clarifying what is at stake in Iraq and who is fighting there.
Greg Richards 4 27 06
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
- The Midwest Twilight Zone and the Death of Common Sense
- Hijacked Jurisdiction: How District Courts Are Blocking Immigration Enforcement
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
Blog Posts
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Karoline Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot
- A visit to DOGE
- You just might be a Democrat if ...
- Yahoo Finance writer says Trump’s tariffs will see America driving Cuban-style antique cars
- Kristi Noem and the prison cell
- Dividing the Democrats
- April 2nd: Liberation Day and Reconciliation Day don’t mix
- Red crayons and hospital gowns
- The Paris Climate Agreement was doomed from the start
- Well excuse me, I don't remember
- Bill Maher goes civil
- Mass shootings: we're all survivors!
- Tesla and a second
- Snow White: a bomb for the ages