Law firm outsourcing to Manila
Business Week notes that Baker & McKenzie, the worlwide law firm is outsourcing some work to Manila.
The challenges of the global economy are nothing new to Baker & McKenzie. The law firm opened its first foreign office —— in Caracas —— in 1955, just six years after Russell Baker teamed up with John McKenzie to form a partnership in Chicago. Today, the firm has grown into a $1.35 billion enterprise, with 8,900 attorneys in 69 offices in the U.S. and 37 other countries. Its 200—person office in Manila shows where the pioneering outfit is headed next —— and where other law firms probably will be, too. The firm also has learned some lessons that may help others following it.
Baker & McKenzie's Manila outpost, first opened in 1963, now provides frontline IT support and computer maintenance for personnel worldwide. It also provides marketing support for the firm around the world, using desktop publishing to create high—quality sales materials and other documents. The office does a lot of word—processing, as well as clerical tasks and some translation work.
In addition, Manila provides business research for the firm globally, pulling together analysis on its biggest 200 clients and their markets and industries.
The outsourced functions are support staff, not core legal work. But it makes perfect sense that certain legal functions, as well as administrative ones as in the case of Baker & McKenzie, can be outsourced.
I am fairly certain that I have previously read of certain types of legal research being outsourced to India. I don't recall the details, but it makes perfect sense to send lower—end functions to trained personnel overseas. Unless regulatory barriers are errected, this should become a trend.
Hat tip: Ed Lasky
Thomas Lifson 1 26 06
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Katherine Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot
- A visit to DOGE
- You just might be a Democrat if ...
- Yahoo Finance writer says Trump’s tariffs will see America driving Cuban-style antique cars
- Kristi Noem and the prison cell
- Dividing the Democrats
- April 2nd: Liberation Day and Reconciliation Day don’t mix