The recusal trap

By

Well, it's always something. If it isn't one thing, it's another. Who would have guessed — other than the legal eagles — that the provisions of Title 28 U.S. Code sec. 455 covering the recusal of judges, justices, and magistrate judges would provide such a compelling reason to sink the nomination of Harriet Miers to our Highest Court. Mr. Wohlstetter over at American Spectator tells us all about it. Or rather, at least enough to raise a very serious question regarding the nominee's suitability.
 
Funny, but you just don't know what you don't know. As the Wall Street Journal's "Best of the Web" would put it, that's why we have experts.
 
Dennis Sevakis   10 06 05

 

 

 
 

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
Astronauts carefully tell the truth
Canada Embraces European Suicide
I’ve recognized manipulation in the past, and I see it now on the Supreme Court

Last 7 Days

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune