The interviewer was much better—more substantive questioning. Edwards is the repeater here—totally outclassed. Cheney destroyed the '90% of the casualties, 90 % of the cost' canard. Plus, didn't Kerry indicate that his way of getting the "allies" to contribute to the effort is to show success on the ground? Isn't this some variant on the flip—flopping that Kerry/Edwards have done:if the war was going well and people rallied around the effort they were for the war; if it was going badly or their campaign was going badly— they turned anti—war.

Ed laskey    10 05 04