September 17, 2005
Arthur Miller
I never liked Arthur Miller's plays, even when I was a young man who accepted most of the ideology of the left. His plays always seemed bleak, the language unnatural, and the characters not very memorable, except for Willy Loman and maybe Bif. I endured a few performances, noticed him when he appeared in the press, but mostly assumed I was too thick to really "get it" about his greatness.
He is dead recently, so I suppose I shouldn't speak ill of him. But I will console myself with directing readers to Mark Steyn's take on the man in the U.K. Spectator.
Thomas Lifson 2 17 05
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Not in Kansas Any More
- Democrats Dying on the Most Desolate Hills
- If She’s an Astronaut … I’m a Jet Fighter Pilot
- Is the Jihadist Trojan Horse Winning?
- Who Has the Best American Autobiography?
- This Easter, Let Us Renew Our Faith
- Is it Time to Ignore the Judiciary?
- Higher Ed is Fighting Back!
- Easter: the Resurrection of Jesus Transformed the World Forever
- Trump’s vision for technological greatness
Blog Posts
- A New Mexico judge resigned over allegations that he kept a Tren de Aragua member in his home
- The Pope’s death is leading to yet more anti-Israel and anti-Trump propaganda
- Ivy League college invites antisemitic rapper onto campus
- Pope Francis, RIP
- It’s not really about Abrego Garcia
- When Oregon became Bart Jason
- Post-election lawfare; legislating from the bench
- Oregon pushes trans track
- The Starliner: worse than we thought
- Professional sports leagues push gun control
- Bukele turns his troll power towards Maduro, offers him an exchange
- So-called 'trans women' activists are getting increasingly dangerous
- The unintended message of ‘Adolescence’
- Slaving over a hot keyboard
- Easter Vigil observation: Thank goodness for immigrants