The great philosopher Casey Stengel once asked the question, can't anybody here play this game?  The game of politics and historical judgment is more difficult to play than baseball, with no single goal, no sense of final victory or measure of achievement.

The protests stemming from the death of George Floyd continue, inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement are occurring internationally as well as in the U.S.  The size, the increasing number, and the manner of foreign protests ostensibly against racism and police brutality have been surprising.  Most have been peaceful, but a minority have been disorderly and at times destructive.  Who would have imagined that an event in Minneapolis would lead to the beheading of the statue of King Leopold II of Belgium in Brussels or the attempt to deface Winston Churchill in London?  In all countries, the dilemma remains of how and if history and prominent figures of the past should be venerated if some part of the population finds them objectionable.

We know of the problem from a well known authority in meddling in American affairs.  President Vladimir Putin on June 14, 2020 spoke of the "deep internal crisis" in the U.S.  Russia, he said, and earlier the Soviet Union, had sympathy for the fight of African-Americans for their natural rights.  But, he continued, when protests turn into mayhem and pogroms, he sees nothing good for the U.S.

How to judge whether individuals should remain honored or erased with historical cleansing?  Three initial problems are immediately evident.  One is that the failings of individuals are usually not central to why they are honored; a second is that no individual is without faults; a third is the historical context of the actions or behavior of individuals.

In democratic systems, there is inevitable tension, perhaps contradiction, between adherence to universalist principles and the realities of public action.  In the present case in the conversation resulting from the brutality against Floyd, the world is caught up not only in the issue of racism, but equally in the issue of whether colonialism and imperialism are to be seen as a series of crimes against humanity or as having brought benefits to civilization.

For some protesters in the U.S., there is little tension.  At a minimum, the monuments and symbols of the Confederacy are being toppled.  Part of the culture of the country is being erased with the elimination of reminders of Thomas Jefferson (in Oregon) and Jefferson Davis.  Yet the actions do not have the magnitude of those in other countries, particularly the Soviet Union in Stalinist years, when people were erased physically by the Cheka under Feliks Dzerzhinsky and the KGB and from photographs.

The death of George Floyd and the impact of the Black Lives Matter movement have convulsed British affairs, though race is not as divisive an issue as in the U.S.  Yet demonstrations in Britain have echoed those in the U.S. as in attacks on historical figures.

Only a small number accused in Britain of being associated with slavery or colonialism have suffered the fate of having their monuments being destroyed of removed, but others may follow.  Monuments have been targeted in 39 British towns and cities, 12 in London.  In Oxford, Cecil Rhodes is precarious, as many members of the faculty in Oriel College  Oxford argue, as have students, holding that he should be removed from his place on the college walls to a museum and "properly contextualized."  Sir Arthur Harris, Bomber Harris, RAF commander in chief during World War II, oversaw bombing raids on Nazi Germany, but his monument in The Strand in London is threatened because of "colonial warmongering" in Rhodesia.  Well wishers are guarding the statue of the celebrated writer George Eliot, who is threatened, though she was an opponent of slavery and anti-Semitism.  If the Labor Party comes to power, more toppling will occur, as its spokespeople have asserted that it will review the appropriateness of monuments and statues on public land and council property.

There is an overlap between those facing toppling and those whose blue plaques may be removed from the walls of London.  Notable examples are Nelson, Kitchener, Capt. James Cook, Robert Clive, Columbus.  The English Heritage, the successor to four previous institutions, is a charity organization that manages more than 400 historic monuments, buildings, and palaces.  Many of them, such as Stonehenge, have become tourist attractions.  Now it is planning to review the plaques, mostly blue — historical markers in public places that commemorate a link between the location of the plaque and individuals who have lived or worked there.  Most of the proposals for installation of a plaque are made by members of the public, and about one third are approved in principle and put on a short list.  It takes about three years for a proposal to reach the top of the list.

The English Heritage is planning to review the 950 plaques in London for links to racism and slavery issues.  It also wants to put up plaques to honor more people from ethnic minorities.

Whom to eliminate and take off the wall?  In this who's who list, one can mention some of the 950 plaques that refer to people in all backgrounds, mostly British but also many foreigners.

 Scientists include Charles Darwin and Alan Turing.  Music has Mozart, Chopin, and Béla Bartók.  Jazz has Ronnie Scott.  Films and theater have Charlie Chaplin, Noel Coward, Ava Gardner.  Sport has W.G, Grace, Jack Hobbs, and Bobby Moore.  About 14% celebrate women who include Sylvia Pankhurst, Ada Lovelace, Rosalind Franklin, Anna Freud, and Florence Nightingale.  Politicians include Churchill, Gladstone, and Lady Astor.  Literature has E.M. Forster, Virginia Woolf, Defoe, and Keats.  Military include Nelson, Lord Kitchener, and General Montgomery.  Pop artists include John Lennon and Jimi Hendrix.  Art includes Pissarro, Canaletto, Van Gogh.  Philosophy includes J.S. Mill, Karl Marx, and Friedrich Engels.  Blacks include Jomo Kenyatta, president of Kenya; Kwame Nkrumah, president of Ghana; and Marcus Garvey, nationalist.  Among foreigners are Napoleon III, Charles de Gaulle, Ben-Gurion, Emile Zola, and Mark Twain.

A new development has occurred in the educational field. A letter signed by Professor Louise Richardson, vice chancellor of Oxford University, and 34 other principals of Oxford Colleges says Floyd's death was a manifestation of institutional racism and that the university is determined to support their black students in every way possible.  His death had a traumatic effect on black students, who were likely to do less well in examinations.  Therefore, black students can apply for changes in the result of their exams.  Other British colleges — University College, London; Newcastle; and Sheffield — have adopted the same idea, confirming that black students would be allowed leniency in their grades.

A new claim by protesters is that murals that line the staircase in the headquarters of the British Foreign Office should be removed.  These are five large murals, completed between 1914 and 1921, which are supposed to be images of the origin, development, expansion, and triumph of the British Empire, ending with the Covenant of the League of Nations.  The complaint focuses on the nature of the murals.  One depicts a small naked black boy, surrounded by whites, presenting a basket of fruits.  A second represents Anglo-Saxons arriving in the country and taking possession of Britannia, thus illustrating for critics the racial superiority of Anglo-Saxons over Celts and Romans.  A third is the picture of Britannia ruling the waves and seeing her sons going to create a world empire.

Meanwhile, Londoners and visiting Americans can enjoy looking at the place where Charlie Chaplin lived.