University Professors for Academic Tyranny
The American Association of University Professors is a semi—trade union for American professors. It claims to be the high—minded guardian of academic freedom in America, going back to John Dewey. But today the AAUP's principles are being strangled. The organization is co—sponsoring a meeting at the prestigious Bellagio Conference Center on the banks of Lake Como, to discuss an academic boycott of Israeli universities.
According to the anti—boycott group, the International Campaign for Academic Freedom:
"AAUP scholars will meet in the villa in Bellagio, on the banks of Lake Como, to discuss academic boycotts and their relation to academic freedom. The Ford and Nathan Cummings foundations contributed the money that would fund the conference and a subsequent publication. The Rockefeller Foundation is providing the site at Bellagio."
More than a third of the participants publicly support boycotts of Israeli universities out of opposition to the Jewish state, according to the New York Sun. In addition to that, the conference organizers had included in the pre—conference packet an anti—Semitic paper by a Holocaust denier.
After discovering these facts, the three major New York—based foundations are now calling for postponement of the conference.
Even so, the AAUP declared that the conference will take place as planned. The AAUP's General Secretary Roger Bowen takes the following contradictory positions:
1. "...academic boycotts are irreconcilable with the purposes of higher education."
2. "There have been calls for the AAUP to postpone or cancel the February 13—17 conference it is sponsoring in Belaggio, Italy. We firmly believe that the conference should proceed as scheduled..."
3. "This week we discovered that, due to an egregious error, we had included in the pre—conference packet a deeply offensive article by a Holocaust denier. The article had been collected during our research for the conference, but it was never intended for distribution to the participants or, indeed, to anyone else."
4. "There are those, including the organizations funding the conference, who suggest that we postpone the conference because of this error. Others have urged postponement because some of the participants are on record as favoring academic boycotts. We believe, rather, that the conference should be held now, with the same group of invitees, and with every intention of mounting an academically rigorous conference."
Alas, the professors do protest too much. What kind of "academically rigorous" research turned up and circulated a "deeply offensive article by a Holocaust denier?" Is this an example of the academic standards AAUP is trying to uphold?
AAUP's rationale sounds like a political zig—zag play. It's just John Kerry voting for the Iraq War before he voted against it.
Odd, isn't it?
It seems that AAUP is not eager to have debates on other questions — Intelligent Design, or boycotting the United Nations, for instance. AAUP won't have a Bellagio meeitings with David Horowitz, or with other critics of Political Correctness on campus. AAUP will never debate the pros and cons of radical feminism.
Those are not real academic questions, you see.
But boycotting Israel is open to debate.
When you agree to debate a question, you legitimize the issue. This is a standard tactic of campus radicals around the US, who hold positions of power in AAUP.
Decent people do not sponsor headline conferences on certain questons. Should we consider the death penalty for Danish cartoonists? Decent people just take a stand on those questions. You can tell a lot about someone's decency by the questions they ask.
The academic freedom principles AAUP claims to espouse are badly needed at home. We live in the Age of Political Correctness. Our universities are bastions of intolerance in a sea of freedom. But AAUP hasn't done anything to protect free speech on campus. It doesn't seem eager to try.
Maybe AAUP's own radicals are just trying to export campus intolerance to the State of Israel.
Well, if Bellagio won't host this rigorous, scholarly meeting, the sponsors can always ask Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
He'll be happy to host a rigorous, scholarly debate in Tehran.
James Lewis is a frequent contributor.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.