Dean's Revenge
Ever since Howard Dean's collapse, his most avid supporters have been out for blood. Deaniacs charge the Kerry campaign with carrying out 'dirty tricks' in order to upset what should have been an easy Dean victory. How else could Dean go from a 30—point lead in
Along comes Ralph Nader.
Nader excites the same constituency Dean did — those who believe the Democratic Party betrayed
The consensus among political analysts is that support for John Kerry is not derived from anything besides a desire to beat Bush. According to a number of polls of primary voters, the main reason people back Kerry is either that he's not Bush or that he is electable. Much farther down the list of reasons for voting for Kerry is that he supports what voters believe in. The reason for this is that few voters change what they believe as fast as Kerry does.
In contrast to Nader and Dean, Kerry shows no reticence about changing his position whenever it is politically expedient to do so. Kerry's widely reported vacillation on the
If Kerry weren't so blas� about changing positions, his remarkably liberal voting record (rated more liberal than icon Ted Kennedy!) would be an asset in the fight for the Deaniac vote. Instead, Kerry looks like more and more of a sellout every time he shifts positions. This is the ultimate betrayal in the eyes of Deaniacs, who are made up largely of angry left—wing true—believers.
There is more trouble ahead for Kerry. The end of the party primary signals the beginning of a move to the center for candidates. Kerry placated the liberal Democratic primary voters by telling them everything they want to hear, and now Kerry has to tip—toe to the right in order to appeal to everyone else. This makes the Nader candidacy all the more damaging for Kerry. As Kerry tries to appeal to swing voters by taking more moderate positions, he will further infuriate Deaniacs. A small but significant percentage of them will be so angered by Kerry's newfound centrist positions that they will turn to Nader in protest. Kerry will then go the route of Al Gore.
The most likely course for Kerry to take addressing the Nader problem will be to keep his positions so fuzzy as to make everyone believe he supports their position. If Kerry is in
Kerry, therefore, is in serious trouble now that he has a firmly left—wing alternative competing against him. Kerry made a pathetic attempt to conciliate with Deaniacs who are eyeing Nader by stating — against all evidence to the contrary — that he 'speaks for those who voted for Nader in 2000.' Kerry will continue to make tone—deaf appeals to Deaniacs who feel disenfranchised by the Kerry candidacy, which will only further infuriate them. As far as Deaniacs are concerned, if Dean can't be president, no Democrat can.
The author graduated from