Dean dot Bomb
Howard Dean was for months touted as the first presidential candidate to harness the power of the Internet. Polls and expectations climbed as the media ran story after story about how the Dean campaign was revolutionizing the way campaigns were run and — most importantly — financed. Yet Dean was ditched by voters in
The jettisoning by Dean of the much—hyped web guru Joe Trippi marked the end of the Dean Internet bubble. Trippi was the mastermind behind the Dean campaign's internet strategy. In a typical article late last year entitled 'Joe Trippi and the Dean Internet Revolution' (November, 2003 The New Republic , available only to subscribers) the admiring author explained that the power of the Dean campaign was derived from online forums. Trippi realized that people form close communities through constant communication in these forums. Eventually those people feel like they have a real stake in the community, and will in turn contribute time and money in order to support common goals. The forums also made planning events and coordinating large numbers of volunteers much easier. This seemed like a real plan for campaign success.
Unfortunately for Trippi, the Dean campaign learned the hard way what Wall Street learned three years ago: that while the Internet is flashy, exciting and interesting, ultimately you need more than an idea to succeed. Just as companies need a solid business foundation that produces real earnings in order to maintain stock prices, you need a solid candidate with a respectable foundation to produce votes. Polls began to slip in December after Saddam was captured, as this deflated Dean's main campaign issue, which was that the war in
The Internet can be a very powerful tool for a presidential candidate, but it cannot be the centerpiece. Ultimately people vote for the candidate, not his method of campaigning. By placing so much emphasis on the Internet, the Dean campaign confused means with substance. While Dean exploited the Internet to amass a war chest that towered over those of his rivals, he squandered it on a massive TV assault that didn't connect with voters. While the ads didn't improve poll numbers, the Internet didn't deliver miracles either.
Despite common perception, online forums can cause serious problems for political campaigns. Users on the Dean website interacted so frequently and exclusively with one another that they convinced themselves — in a huge and tragic case of groupthink — that their ideas were faultless and that failure was impossible. When the Dean forum—goers tried to attract other voters, they appeared self—righteous and out of touch with the average American.
Grass—roots campaigning requires connecting on a personal level with people who think differently than you do. By providing a comfortable environment for people who have trouble with face—to—face social interaction, Dean supporters became much better at preaching to the choir than to the masses. Needless to say, this did not translate into victory at the polls.
The nature of online forums also pushes the campaign atmosphere to extremes. In good times, the forum reinforces the feeling that victory is inevitable. In bad times, everything points to failure. When I logged onto a Dean forum following the first loss in
Joe Trippi was replaced by a true
The author graduated from