fitness as President and his sanity based on some things he says. Wouldn’t it be wise to analyze Hillary’s and Obama’s fitness to be President based on what they have actually said and done?

On September 11, 2012 our consulate was attacked in Benghazi, Libya and four Americans died. We did not know how long the attack would last yet Obama and Hillary did absolutely nothing to save those Americans. They did not meet in the situation room yet they did have time to concoct a false story blaming the video. Obama didn’t even attend the intelligence briefing the following morning.

On September 14   2012 the bodies came home and families have said that Hillary repeated the story about the video that she had been telling the public.

On September 16, 2012 Susan Rice went on five Sunday news shows to blame the video instead of terrorism

On September 28, 2012, Obama continued to tell the video lie in his UN speech.

Are a President and person running for President fit to be President when they continually lied by blaming a video to protect their power instead of telling the truth about terrorism?

In January 2013, Hillary said to a House committee on Benghazi that at this point what difference does it make why the Americans died. Does a person who has no empathy for those who died and doesn’t care why Americans died have the right temperament to be President?

From January 2009 until she left office in January 2013 Obama knew Hillary was not using secure government emails but did nothing to stop it. Are people who don’t care about the nation’s security laws fit to be President?

On July 31^st, Hillary went on TV and called the mother of one of those killed in Benghazi a liar. She also called FBI Director a liar. Does a person who calls a grieving Mother and the FBI director liars have the right temperament and does she have enough empathy to be President?  Is it sane to continually lie when the truth is on tape? Should Democratic leaders intervene to tell Hillary the truth is known and she can’t delete the tapes?

Is it sane to believe or repeat that $400 Million in cash on the same day of a hostage release isn’t ransom? Is a person who repeatedly ignores the laws and their oath of office fit to be President?

This morning I saw Becky Quick on CNBC say it is amazing that Hillary and the $400 million payment to Iran get so little coverage. It is appalling and intentional, not amazing. The networks have chosen their candidate, party and agenda and facts don’t matter. Hillary is such an unappealing candidate and Obama and Hillary have such a poor economic and foreign policy record to run on that they have no choice but to trash Trump.

Is a congenital liar who cared so little about the nation’s security and so much about her privacy fit to be President?