Democrats’ photo ID hypocrisy
I heard on the radio the other day that our local housing authority was taking applications for subsidized housing, and I was completely shocked that they were requiring a photo ID. I thought it was oppressing or disenfranchising to require the poor, the elderly, the disabled, and minorities to require a photo ID. It turns out that the national housing authority (HUD) requires it.
This made me think of other places that the federal government requires a photo ID:
Social Security now requires direct deposit of your benefits, and to set up an account the federal government requires banks to have a photo ID on file.
To take a tour of the White House requires a photo ID.
To sign up for Medicaid, you need a photo ID.
The TSA requires a photo ID to get on a plane.
The federal government and Democrats obviously know that the poor, the disabled, minorities, and the elderly have the ability to get photo ID and that the laws are not oppressing anyone, yet when a state passes a sensible law to require a photo ID to vote, the U.S. government will sue them for disenfranchising voters.
The Democrats do not want people to prove they are actually eligible to vote because Democrats are more likely to get the votes of illegal immigrants and people voting multiple times.
Republicans should keep pushing the voter ID laws. All adults need a photo ID to function in today’s society. It is not punishing anyone to require them.

FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- What’s the Real Target of the Assault on Tesla?
- MAGA: Progress, Not Perfection
- Saving American Culture through ‘Counter-Spoliation’
- Anecdotes from the Time of Autism
- War Is Hell
- Deep State Anatomy and Physiology
- Sisterhood of the Traveling Pronouns
- Trump’s Tariffs: A Chance to Bring Back Lost Jobs
- Trump's Six-Point Plan for Making America Great Again
- Make IRS Sauce The Same For Both Citizen Goose and Politician Gander
Blog Posts
- The Democrats’ superiority complex
- On Wisconsin: The pundit class fumbles (again)
- Around the world, the smart way and the dumb way to respond to Trump's tariffs
- Burning Teslas
- Senator, you talk too much
- The Atlantic's phony migrant tear-jerker about a pitiful 'Maryland father' shipped back to El Salvador falls apart
- Rep. Luna, forgets she’s on the Republican Team!
- Veruca Salt politics or the inevitable result of ‘the personal is political’
- Taliban justice in the streets of Bordeaux, and a Sharia ‘mega city’ comes to Texas
- French judge releases an accused rapist because he’s ‘fairly integrated’
- The Luigi cult is still out there, gushing and festering
- In New York, a tax service company targets illegal aliens as potential customers for child tax credits
- When antisemitic leftists play the ‘Jewish card’
- FDA’s vaccine-rubberstamp Peter Marks forced to resign, and Big Pharma stocks take a nosedive
- Will Colorado pass what’s essentially a ‘trans blasphemy’ bill? *UPDATED*