ObamaCare: A very expensive six-year-old!
ObamaCare just turned six, and it is one expensive law, as we just read in the Tribune Review editorial:
On the sixth anniversary of President Obama signing the ObamaCare law and saddling the nation with its regulatory diktats, here's a disquieting statistic that won't be trumpeted: $55 billion in waste and counting.
Investor's Business Daily crunched the numbers. More troubling still is that the hemorrhaging will continue from this health care mess. Among the losses to date:
• $1.2 billion in startup loans for ObamaCare's 12 (out of 23) failed insurance co-ops.
• $1.5 billion in failed or unrealized state-run health exchanges — and not one of the remaining 14 is fully functional, according to a government audit.
• An estimated $45 billion for the 165 million hours that businesses and individuals spent trying to comply with ObamaCare's 106 new regulations.
• $750 million in public subsidies to more than 500,000 people who weren't eligible for coverage.
• $3.5 billion diverted from the Treasury to insurance companies to help cover their losses.
For all the happy talk about gains in the public's insurance coverage (except, of course, for the unfortunate folks who signed up with one of the government's failed insurance co-ops), the reality is a burgeoning, unsustainable government bureaucracy that is on pace to cost considerably more.
The bad news is that ObamaCare is very expensive. The good news is that it may not survive this cost trajectory, i.e. collapse of its own weight!
We are already hearing criticism from the Clintons about ObamaCare. Chelsea Clinton said publicly that her mother would control ObamaCare's "crushing costs" by executive order. This is obviously a sign that Democrats know that the law is not working, or at least not working as promised.
We read that many of the exchanges have failed. Enrollment is down 40%, in large part because people without subsidies are not signing up.
The ObamaCare is about something else: Don't do big things on a one party basis. ObamaCare would have been a much better law if President Obama had listened to GOP critics and put together a bipartisan law.
P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
ObamaCare just turned six, and it is one expensive law, as we just read in the Tribune Review editorial:
On the sixth anniversary of President Obama signing the ObamaCare law and saddling the nation with its regulatory diktats, here's a disquieting statistic that won't be trumpeted: $55 billion in waste and counting.
Investor's Business Daily crunched the numbers. More troubling still is that the hemorrhaging will continue from this health care mess. Among the losses to date:
• $1.2 billion in startup loans for ObamaCare's 12 (out of 23) failed insurance co-ops.
• $1.5 billion in failed or unrealized state-run health exchanges — and not one of the remaining 14 is fully functional, according to a government audit.
• An estimated $45 billion for the 165 million hours that businesses and individuals spent trying to comply with ObamaCare's 106 new regulations.
• $750 million in public subsidies to more than 500,000 people who weren't eligible for coverage.
• $3.5 billion diverted from the Treasury to insurance companies to help cover their losses.
For all the happy talk about gains in the public's insurance coverage (except, of course, for the unfortunate folks who signed up with one of the government's failed insurance co-ops), the reality is a burgeoning, unsustainable government bureaucracy that is on pace to cost considerably more.
The bad news is that ObamaCare is very expensive. The good news is that it may not survive this cost trajectory, i.e. collapse of its own weight!
We are already hearing criticism from the Clintons about ObamaCare. Chelsea Clinton said publicly that her mother would control ObamaCare's "crushing costs" by executive order. This is obviously a sign that Democrats know that the law is not working, or at least not working as promised.
We read that many of the exchanges have failed. Enrollment is down 40%, in large part because people without subsidies are not signing up.
The ObamaCare is about something else: Don't do big things on a one party basis. ObamaCare would have been a much better law if President Obama had listened to GOP critics and put together a bipartisan law.
P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
Recent Articles
- CNN's Eye is on the Sparrow
- Pro-Abortion Leftists Go All In on Eugenics
- Obama Supercharged the Left's Embrace of Censorship
- The Thrill and Terror of the World on the Brink of World War II
- Margaret Thatcher: The Grocer’s Daughter?
- What the Blue-State Left-Coasters Don't Understand about Culture
- Were There ‘Right-Wing’ Riots When Tucker Carlson Called For A Colorblind Meritocracy?
- Tucker Carlson Is Brilliant But This Time He’s Wrong
- Do We Really Want to Take Out Vladimir Putin?
- Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of Science
Blog Posts
- What it means that Hillary Clinton did it
- Elon Musk is going on the offensive with a ‘hardcore’ legal department
- Shocking poll reveals Blacks see their White neighbors very negatively
- The #MeToo movement has claimed a brilliant scientist
- Bill Maher has had it with his party’s transgender madness
- Soviet-style apparatchiks at the NLRB blocked from killing ‘The Federalist’
- Morally bankrupt Bernie Sanders fundraises with antisemitism
- NYC Mayor Eric Adams reveals how out-of-touch Democrats are
- A climate change class action lawsuit: is it viable?
- America has reached a crisis point of socialism
- What difference does the 'hate' in 'hate crime' make?
- Is Hillary Clinton really about to get what's coming to her?
- Does science owe reparations to God?
- Maybe Sherlock Holmes can unmask the Supreme Court leaker
- Why the brave archbishop made his move on Nancy Pelosi now