Hillary will take a hit on Obama’s Gitmo plan
I watched President Obama as he held a news conference yesterday to announce his plan to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. As I listened to the president and his list of long proven false-to-fact reasons for closing the facility, I couldn't help but wonder what the effect of this is going to be on Hillary Clinton's campaign. Later, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton answered me by abandoning national security-minded Democrats and supporting Obama's ill-advised decision.
President Obama continues to insist that the facility at Guantanamo Bay is a recruiting tool for ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other terrorist groups. Although I have heard a (very) few senior military officers reiterate the president's claims, I have yet to hear one cite a single case where an ISIS or al-Qaeda fighter claims to have joined the cause simply because of our detention facility. I haven't even heard of an instance where it was the tipping point for such a potential recruit who had heretofore been on the fence about it. It's a bogus argument, and the president knows it, and the senior officers, who are supposed to be apolitical, know it.
President Obama also claims that closing Guantanamo will enhance our security. His plan says we will release some prisoners to countries who will take them. Others we will transfer to a yet to be decided facility in the United States. How this would enhance our security, I cannot imagine, especially given the 30%-plus recidivism rate among already released former prisoners.
While junior, mid-grade, and most senior military officers understand the above, some other folks who also get it are ordinary rank-and-file union workers, a core Clinton constituency. Some of them live in Boston and New York, both previously attacked by terrorists – in the case of New York, multiple times. Many have served in uniform, and they know that this move by President Obama will not enhance our national security. These are the Reagan Democrats who, despite some political differences with Republicans, are still very patriotic and hold no truck with politicians sacrificing our national security on the altar of leftist ideals or to fulfill some personal legacy.
President Obama and Mrs. Clinton have made a huge unforced error, one that Republicans should take immediate advantage of. Her support for the president on this issue risks weakening her support from the Reagan Democrats above. These are the folks she will need to rely upon to knock on doors and make telephone calls in the general election. The one thing the Republican field should not allow is for Hillary Clinton, with or without the connivance of the press, not to be held accountable for her stance on this issue. They need to call her on this, early and often, and thus separate her from this important constituency.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- From Churchill to Vance...Sounding Off About Tyranny
- Globalist Games: They Play, We Pay
- Scorched-Earth Disease Control
- NATO, Ukraine, and the War Hawks’ Pixie Dust Playbook
- On XY in XX’s Sports, Whoopi G. Opens Her Mouth—and Removes All Doubt
- Donald Trump’s Return: A Foreign Policy Reset After Biden’s Weakness
- The Danes and the Greenlanders: How They See Trump's America
- The USAID Case: Judge Amir Ali’s $2 Billion Defiance Escalates
- Terrifying Tariffs: Tax Policy as Back-Door Foreign Aid
- Dr. Marty Makary’s ‘Blind Spots’ Book Is At Odds With Established Findings
Blog Posts
- Schumer caves on shutdown after Dem private lunch erupted in a shouting match
- It's amendment-decorating season in Oregon
- UN climate change conference to be held in Amazon rainforest, trees sacrificed
- I’m all broken up about Mahmoud Khalil’s rights
- Destuction's defenders
- Go away, Randi
- After blowing $9 billion on 'free' health care for illegals, California's Gov. Gavin Newsom asks for a bailout
- Trump throws down the gauntlet to the out-of-control federal district court judges *UPDATED*
- Ronald Reagan also had a slow economic start
- Getting the left out of the political wilderness
- Oregon selects a trans-turtle and a trans-meteor to sit on a ‘mental health advisory board’
- Fly the DEI skies...and hope that you land safely
- This 70-year-old woman is serving 9 years in prison
- Stacey Abrams really, really, wants 'her' $2 billion from Biden's EPA slush fund
- The (un)masked magician’s apprentice