Gov. Abbott of Texas should say 'no'
Over the last few weeks, I've heard Governor Huckabee say that he won't bow to the Supreme Court. He went farther today:
Constitution, we have three, coequal branches of government. The courts can interpret law but cannot create it. The ruling still requires congressional funding and executive branch enforcement. The Supreme Court is not the "Supreme Branch," and it is certainly not the Supreme Being. If they can unilaterally make law, and just do whatever they want, then we have judicial tyranny.
Throughout our nation's history, the court has abused its power and delivered morally unconscionable rulings. They have rationalized the destruction of innocent human life, defined African Americans as property and justified Japanese-American internment camps. U.S. presidents, including Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, ignored Supreme Court rulings, rejecting the notion that the Supreme Court can circumvent the Constitution and "make law."
I also reject the idea of "judicial supremacy" as just another flawed, failed feature of big government, inconsistent with what our founders fought a revolution to establish.
I'm not endorsing Governor Huckabee. I am instead calling on Governor Abbott of Texas to stand up to this ruling by saying something like this:
First, the Supreme Court is not in the business of creating rights. Justice Kennedy, and 4 others, created a right. They also used the 14th amendment to create a right that was never intended by the people who framed it. Can someone show me where marriage, or the definition of marriage, stands in the context of the 14th amendment?
Second, the people of Texas voted in huge numbers to define marriage between a man and a woman. What happens to these Texans? Who respects their vote?
Third, Texas will not accept this decision. We will meet President Obama, or anybody else, at a Constitutional Convention.
The conventional wisdom is that the issue is now settled, as was abortion in 1973. I don't think so with same-sex marriage. I believe that a governor should challenge it. My guess is that he will find that a lot of other governors will join him.

We learned this week that justices can rewrite laws and create rights. It's time for someone to say no.
P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Biden's National Censorship Regime
- Four Years, Five Fiascos: The Toll of Government Overreach
- The Legacy of the Roberts Court
- Parental Rights at Risk from Tyrannical State Overreach
- Alexander Hamilton: A Brilliant and Conflicted Leader
- The Death of the Center-Left in America
- ‘Make Peace, You Fools! What Else Can You Do?’
- When Nuclear Regulation Goes Awry
- The Danger of Nothing
- A New Pope With Courage
Blog Posts
- Pope Francis kicked an important can down the road
- Media hypocrisy: Hegseth must go because he’ll get us all killed
- Britain bans French philosopher who conceptualized the 'great replacement' theory, from entering country
- AOC versus visionary leadership
- The color revolution waged by our judiciary
- Fredi Otto, the new Greta Thunberg
- Why Democrats should become Republicans
- Terrorism works?
- Are we prepared for a new Chinese period of the warring states?
- Trump challenges the Fed
- The last Austrian standing
- Tim Walz: helping China colonize Minnesota?
- Another insubordinate officer?
- Keeping terrorists in America
- Celebrate Earth Day by not burning a Tesla