21st-century Fourth Amendment faces first legislative test in Virginia
The Fourth Amendment reads:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Virginia was the home of the Fourth Amendment’s author, James Madison, but Virginia oddly does not have its own Fourth Amendment. Earlier, weaker language prohibiting “general warrants” for searches and seizures drafted by George Mason is found in Article I, Section 10 of the Virginia Constitution.
Monday, a subcommittee in the Virginia General Assembly will hold the first hearing on HJ 578, introduced by Delegate Rich Anderson. It is a Fourth Amendment for the 21st century.
The proposed amendment clarifies that unreasonable searches and seizures may not be made of our digital data (i.e., e-mails and data stored on computers or cell phones). This is a logical extension of “papers and effects” from James Madison’s 18th-century version.
HJ 578 reverses what is known as the “third-party doctrine” so that people’s data stored in the cloud would be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Since devices the size of birds used to spy on our backyards, fields, and pastures did not exist in the 18th century, the 21st-century Fourth Amendment includes “lands” as being protected.
Madison’s version did not clearly define terms such as “probable cause” or “unreasonable searches and seizures.” That has created lots of litigation and thousands of pages of case law that frequently confuse lawyers and judges. All this is certainly not of comfort in protecting our fundamental rights of security in our “persons, houses, papers and effects.”
Delegate Anderson’s version gives better clarity to those terms, and also fixes the recent and dreaded U.S. Supreme Court decision in Heien v. California, where a “mistake of law” was deemed reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. I explained why that was a disastrous decision (“Lazy, Incompetent Bureaucrats Will Celebrate the Heien Decision for Years”).

In Heien, the Supreme Court basically ruled that ignorance of the law is no excuse for people, but it is acceptable for government law enforcement in the search and seizure process.
The Fourth Amendment – not politicians, bureaucrats, or even judges – is what prevents America from becoming a police state. It is law enforcement on law enforcement itself. Gallup polls, however, show that Americans fear their government in record numbers.
How HJ 578 is treated will tell us if Virginia legislators will protect fundamental rights, or protect government lawlessness.
The amendment is supported by the Virginia Tea Party Federation, Americans for Prosperity, and ACLU Virginia. Among those who will be testifying for its passage are former Virginia attorney general Ken Cuccinelli and yours truly.
A companion version was introduced in the other chamber by Virginia Senator Richard Stuart. The first hearing on HJ 578 is Monday, January 26 before the House Privileges and Elections Constitutional Amendments Sub-Committee.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
- Tariffs and the Moral High Ground
- ‘Mahmoud Khalil, Who Are You?’
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
Blog Posts
- The Biden White House mixed it up with not one but two autopens
- The Shakespeare National Trust determines that Shakespeare is ‘not to be’
- Carville tells Democrats to quit making asses of themselves
- About that Texas congressman who called the transgender member of Congress 'Mister' ...
- A federal district court judge erases Trump’s ability to rid the country of enemy aliens
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much
- Bacha Bazi still being practiced in Afghanistan; young boys sexually abused
- UN judge convicted of forcing a woman into indentured servitude
- What are capital gains, really?
- Trump begins restoring law and order
- Purge the poison: End Middle East Studies
- The Godfather: 53 and getting better all the time
- Why aren't Johnny and Suzie reading?
- ActBlue smurfs its way to oblivion
- Hunter Biden hotfoots it to a luxury vacation in South Africa, seemingly to avoid a deposition on his claimed poverty