EPA can't find administrator's text messages
Justice Department officials have informed a federal court that text messages from EPA administrator Gina McCarthy are missing. The texts are part of an FOIA request from the Competitive Enterprise Institute and could reveal close coordination by the EPA with environmental groups in developing regulations that would cripple the coal industry.
CEI has charged that McCarthy began to use her private email and text accounts in order to avoid congressional scrutiny.
An EPA spokeswoman said agency officials have acknowledged to the court and to the National Archives that the agency doesn’t have the text messages, but they contend the messages never had to be stored in the first place, since they were personal in nature and aren’t required to be preserved under open-records laws, nor turned over under the Freedom of Information Act.
“EPA is not aware of any evidence that federal records have been unlawfully destroyed,” said Liz Purchia, the EPA spokeswoman.
She said the notification to the archives was being done “out of an abundance of caution.”
Both written and electronic federal agency records are required to be preserved, similar to emails, but not every communication is deemed to be a record. As more communications are done online, states and federal agencies are increasingly grappling with those questions.
A Washington Times sample survey of federal agencies earlier this year found that most don’t have a policy governing whether employees should be preserving and storing those kinds of electronic communications.
Transparency advocates fear that some government officials may be using text messages or computer instant-chat networks to try to get around the law.
![]()
In the letter the EPA will send to the Archives, the agency will argue that text messages “are inherently unlikely to qualify for preservation” because they are usually limited, and can’t contain the kinds of decision-making that qualifies as a “record.”
Unlike other agencies surveyed by The Times, the EPA says it has had a policy since 2005 instructing employees to save any text messages that would qualify for preservation, and it has no evidence that employees are failing to do that.
The EPA also says that even if text messages were being destroyed in violation with its guidance, that’s not against the law because they believe text messages are “transitory records … which may be deleted when no longer needed,” Ms. Purchia said.
Justice Department lawyers informed the court of their intent to notify the Archives through a “factual update” in the court record.
It would be illegal for McCarthy to conduct public business using her private email and text accounts, so the fact that these records have gone missing is highly suspicious. And if it was ever found that the texts were deliberately destroyed, obstruction of justice charges would be forthcoming.
Funny how Obama administration officials keep losing communications that could incriminate them.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trillions in Graft
- The Trump Strategy for Ukraine
- President Trump Is Wrong on Gaza
- Digital Prisons
- Can Bounty Hunters Solve Our Immigration Crisis?
- No, Whites Are Not Responsible For Black Outcomes
- The Soul of the Democrats
- Canada at the Crossroads
- Kash Patel: Poised to Lead the FBI Into a New Era
- Never Again?
Blog Posts
- Europeans who love freedom have a friend in the White House
- Time for accountability from Big Tech
- Netanyahu’s humiliation(s)
- Who will replace Mitch McConnell?
- Musk to American people: Look what the feds are doing with your money!
- Could you get away with what the left is doing
- Smackdown: White House aide Stephen Miller stomps down leftist canard about Elon being 'unelected'
- Tea for two in '72
- High on the hog: Stacey Abrams groups scarfed up $2 billion in environmental grants in 2024 -report
- Now that he’s confirmed, Kash Patel has a Herculean task ahead of him
- The DOGE FAQs
- A quick overview of the Russo-Ukrainian war, from 2008–2025
- In Oregon, wildfire risk is assessed from 'eight miles high, and it ain't exactly clear'
- Trump resurrects Kissinger
- One man's loyalist is another man's sycophant