« Obama: African-Americans Are Incapable of Acting as Citizens of the United States | Fewer competitive House and Senate seats in 2014 means possible GOP gains »
July 22, 2013
In support of a limited DREAM Act
The US Senate immigration bill is a bit too comprehensive for me. In other words, too long, too bureaucratic and full of potential unintended consequences. So I hope that the House will start fresh and look at several bills rather than one "comprehensive" solution.
For the record, I do not support "a path to citizenship." However, I would like to see some pathway to legalization for those who are here and wish to stay here. My "path" includes a fine, back taxes, probation and a commitment to assimilate into the US.

It would simply provide these individuals with some type of "work visa" that allows them to work in the US.
It is not a "green card" or put you on any list to anything. It simply allows you to work legally in the US. The visa can be renewed every so many years. The visa holder would be subject to deportation if he or she engaged in any kind of illegal activity.
So what do we do with the young people or "the dreamers"?
The Dream Act, or whatever the House GOP wants rename it, involves youngsters. It gives the GOP House the opportunity to demonstrate that they have a heart. It would also create a lot of goodwill with younger Hispanics who've lived here for much of their lives.
I'm diappointed that conservatives in the GOP don't jump on a plan that would grant legalization to thousands of kids who were brought here by their parents.
You can limit the plan to those young people who've completed high school, attending college or willing to serve in the US military.
Politically speaking, it would show that the GOP can act on immigration.
The House should pass a tough border security measure, with very harsh employer sanctions, and add a pathway for the aforementioned young people. It makes sense for the country and it's good politics. it would take away the Democrats' talking point that the GOP is not concerned with these young people.
The House could then take the time to discuss and analyze the legal and economic consequences of the 10 million or so who are here.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
- Malicious Imbeciles
- Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
Blog Posts
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges
- How Mississippi eliminated the income tax
- The ‘agua’ battle on the border