Pelosi, Democrats in denial about spending
Well, not exactly denial. More like attempting to spin the facts to suit a political agenda.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that the looming sequestration is "a bad idea all around" and called for a balance of spending cuts and closing tax loopholes in order to avoid it.
"It is almost a false argument to say we have a spending problem. We have a budget deficit problem that we have to address," she told Fox News's Chris Wallace on Sunday.
The Democratic House leader said she backed a "big, bold proposal," to curb long-term spending, and, short of that, a plan that ended subsidies for large oil companies and eliminated loopholes in the tax code.
"It isn't as much a spending problem as much as it is priorities," she said at another point, arguing that tax subsidies were a better target than cuts to programs such as education.
"Nothing brings more money to the Treasury of the United States than investment in education of the American people, so we have to recognize that," she said. "Cuts in education, scientific research and the rest are harmful and they are what are affected by the sequestration."
![]()
Both Democrats and Republicans say they want to avoid the sequestration, an across-the-board cut to both military and non-defense programs that looms on March 1 if no action is taken. But Republicans argue the bill should be replaced solely by cuts to spending, while Democrats want to see a mix of cuts and increases in revenue.
"Almost" a false argument to say we have a spending problem? Only a liberal could say something like that with a straight face.
But maybe she's serious. Perhaps Democrats see nothing much wrong with trillion dollar deficits (ooops! Only $830 billion for this year says CBO). We really don't know because the Democratic Senate hasn't written a budget in 3 years.We'll see how serious they are about deficit reduction when they publish a budget next month.
How Pelosi can make the statement that education brings more money into the treasury than anything else is a mystery - especially the way the federal government spends education dollars. But the truth hardly matters when talking about "investments" - a weasel word in and of itself because Democrats don't want to use the term "government spending."
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Democrats Descend into Madness
- The Supreme Court Just Greenlit a $2 Billion USAID Power Grab
- The Enduring Battle Over ‘Merit’
- Who Is Andrew Tate and Why Is The President Trying to Protect Him?
- Trump Has Cornered the Market on ‘Hope and Change’
- The Peril of Modern Entanglements
- An End to Cynicism
- Democrats -- And Their Media -- Prove That They’re The Enemies Of The People
- Make Alberta America
- The Trump Speech and the Conservative Mandate
Blog Posts
- The most shockingly ‘generous’ government worker pension plan in the USA
- Vampires or voters? Or both?
- The (huge) hidden benefits of DOGE’s work
- Middle East peace proposal: Make Gaza a protectorate
- Trump gets what America is about
- A welcome break from Biden’s Justice Department
- Who wins in a tariff war?
- Impeaching rogue judges will be a hard row to hoe
- The SCOTUS a little more than half-nuts
- How powerful is the Supreme Court?
- Supreme Court’s $2 billion foreign aid ruling sparks debate over judicial overreach
- No case of Nancy, with the laughing face
- Sanders and Slotkin confront our president’s gifted oratory
- Have the Dems finally shown us a Dead Zone moment?
- In defense of English primary literacy: Shutter the U.S. Department of Education