New political reality: Indies no longer decide national elections
In fact, the idea of an "independent" voter who switches allegiances from election to election is pretty much by the boards. Romney carried independents by a healthy margin in 5 of the 8 toss-up states and yet lost them all to Obama's turn out machine.
Strategists in both parties now believe that the Romney campaign and the GOP in general completely missed a significant new reality: Many voters who chose to remain unaffiliated with either party are no longer shifting their allegiance from election to election, candidate to candidate. Instead, they are becoming increasingly partisan and predictable. That means that in order to win, each party must be far more ambitious in cementing its base - as Team Obama did - to win elections.
In fact, three weeks after the election, a shell-shocked senior Romney aide conceded: "We always said if we were winning independents in Ohio, we would win Ohio because that's just the way it always was," Romney political director Rich Beeson said. "They [the Obama campaign] were looking at a different dynamic, and their dynamic proved out."
Indeed, the Obama's campaign's relentless voter modeling early on revealed that the voting bloc that was historically considered independent - and that had behaved as swing voters - was fast shrinking. Instead, most current unaffiliated voters were identifying with one party or the other - and voting that way.
"Moderates is a better way to define the people who swing back and forth ... and those are the people who you're going to fight over," said Obama campaign manager Jim Messina at a recent POLITICO Playbook breakfast, when asked if the notion of independents deciding elections was passé. And by that definition, Messina claims that Obama prevailed with swing voters by 15 percentage points.
Not just "cementing" its base, but getting it to turn out on election day. This requires very sophisticated modeling that the Obama campaign used with great effect in swing states. The more supporters you can identify - perhaps even before the voter himself realizes it - the more targeted your turn out machine can be.

In a hyperpartisan political world, this was inevitable. Now the GOP has to play catch-up - a daunting task considering they still barely know what hit them on election day.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Sitting Down for the 'College Talk'
- Trump’s Tariffs Will Not Cause Inflation
- The Republican Off-Cycle Election Challenge
- Cory Booker and an MS-13 Massacre
- Disentangle from Europe
- No Evidence Aired in the Media? No Duty. No Apologies.
- What’s the Real Target of the Assault on Tesla?
- MAGA: Progress, Not Perfection
- Saving American Culture through ‘Counter-Spoliation’
- Anecdotes from the Time of Autism
Blog Posts
- The EU attempts to control the world economy -- again
- Liberation Day vs. double standards
- The mauling of NPR
- Snow Edsel White?
- Jasmine Crockett concedes she was a DEI hire, admitting ‘no experience’
- California still hasn’t economically recovered from 2020—but it’s a ‘pandemic hangover’, not Democrat policy!
- Cory Booker’s ‘pretty stunning biological feat’ was a pathetic charade
- With the border secure, Trump cleans up Biden’s excesses on parole, TPS
- Baptists and Bootleggers
- Trump’s tariffs are all about putting America first after decades of exploitation
- The Dragon slips the spotlight
- VIDEO: Trump’s tariffs are necessary and completely pro-American
- The Left is experiencing the grief cycle on a loop
- The Democrats’ superiority complex
- On Wisconsin: The pundit class fumbles (again)