FBI facial recognition technology a threat to liberty?
Some privacy advocates think so. Government's ability to spy on us, track us, and now pick us out of a crowd is growing faster than our ability to assess the threats to our freedom.
You don't have to be a paranoid to ask legitimate questions about where all this is leading:
They're watching you -- or at least will be in a couple of years. That's when the FBI is gearing up for a nationwide launch of a $1 billion project designed to identify people of interest, according to the New Scientist. Dubbed the Next Generation Identification (NGI) program, the high-tech endeavor uses biometric data such as DNA analysis, iris scans and voice identification to track down folks with a criminal history. The FBI also plans to take NGI on the road literally by using public cameras to pick faces from the crowd and cross check them with its national repository of images. Let's just say this facial technology isn't going to be used for lighthearted Japanese vocaloid hijinks or unlocking your electronic device. The use and scope of NGI, which kicked off a pilot program in February, will likely be questioned not just by black helicopter watchers but privacy advocates as well. Facial recognition has certainly been a touchy issue in privacy circles -- something Facebook learned firsthand in Germany. Meanwhile, the Electronic Frontier Foundation is already raising concerns about innocent civilians being mixed up or included in the database. Naturally, the FBI claims that the NGI program is in compliance with the U.S. Privacy Act. On the positive side, at least they didn't name it the Genetic Lifeform and Disk Operating System.
To be sure, it's good to have a few hysterics around when government proposes a program with the potential to violate our rights. But a rational look at the facial recognition tech should include the benefits as well. As with any other program, careful oversight will allay many concerns that arise whenever new technologies have the potential threaten our liberty.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Upside Of A Terminal Illness
- Can You Trust that Airplane?
- Closing the DoE
- The Arbery Shooting: The Facts
- Unleashing American Competitiveness: Trump and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
- EU and Ukraine: Stop Blaming Trump, Look in the Mirror
- The Democrats Descend into Madness
- The Supreme Court Just Greenlit a $2 Billion USAID Power Grab
- The Enduring Battle Over ‘Merit’
- Who Is Andrew Tate and Why Is The President Trying to Protect Him?
Blog Posts
- There’s a new sheriff in town — and he’s taking no prisoners.
- So-called ‘Gender affirming’ surgery is bad for people’s happiness
- Stacey Abrams takes a page from Hugo Chavez on the matter of home appliances
- After Trump's speech, they can’t get there from here
- In San Francisco, a bathhouse gets grief for trying to have a ‘phallus free’ environment
- Does mourning brutally murdered children who are white mean you are a ‘white supremacist?' Some leftists think so
- ‘People used to care about each other’
- At Twitter, a single point of failure for freedom
- Active-duty soldiers indicted for disclosing sensitive government info to China
- Zelensky's arrogance
- Americans have already chosen their fighter
- Breaking the chains of financial enslavement
- Blue on blue, heartache on heartache
- Michelle Wu sets a new criminal-enabling standard
- California tries to tear down the Castle Doctrine