Dems won't answer 'Are you better off than 4 years ago?'
You expected...what? The truth? Not from these guys. And when one of them. Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley, actually told the truth on Face the Nation yesterday and said he couldn't say whether people were better off than 4 years ago, the light speed call from the Obama campaign to the governor's office probably set some sort of record.
A day after saying, no, the country was not better off than it was four years ago, Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley reversed course on Monday and said, yes, indeed it was.
"We are clearly better of as a country because we're now creating jobs rathare than losing them," O'Malley, a Democrat, said on CNN's Starting Point. "But we have not recovered all that we lost in the Bush recession. That's why we need to continue to move forward."
He then motioned to a panel that included Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, among others. "Is there anyone on this panel that thinks we've recovered all we lost in the Bush recession? Clearly we're moving forward, we're creating jobs, unemployment is down, job creation is up. And that job creation would not happen without the president's leadership."
Best to get your talking points set before you go on air, Marty.
Ronald Reagan didn't have this problem in 1984 because the economy had already begun to roar back. Clinton's "recovery" from a nearly non-existent recession wasn't an issue.The economy in 2004 was working in Bush's favor as well.
Obama is the first president since Carter where the "better off" question resonates. But it will take careful framing from the Romney campaign or the notion that the Bush recession is still to blame will also resonate. It's still a 50-50 proposition with voters as to how much blame for the lousy economy goes to Obama - no matter the reality. That's why I expect the Romney ads on the question to include an acknowledgment -- as Romney and every major GOP speaker did during the convention - that Obama inherited a mess but he's had 3 1/2 years to fix it (2 years of total Democratic control of government) and has made very little progress.
For that reason, the "better off" question won't be quite the devastating attack it was for Reagan against Carter. But careful framing will show Obama's policy failures and failure of leadership as well.

Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump-O-Phobia Drives Some Americans to Questionable Greener Pastures Overseas
- A Businessman and a Brilliant Strategist
- A Remarkable Headline for a Fascinating Story
- Democrats Unmask Themselves
- How Mexico Became China’s Trojan Horse in U.S. Trade
- Covid Redux: The Bird Flu Scare
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
Blog Posts
- New York Times goes bipolar on Trump’s border control success
- Mark Kelly decides to offload his Tesla to protest Elon Musk
- The half-million dollar American
- Three things for the U.S. to understand about the Middle East
- Speaker Mike Johnson reveals why the Autopen scandal is a big deal
- The CDC website really needs to update its COVID protocols
- Hands in your back pocket
- Birthright citizenship: The facts
- ‘She’s my little Musk coupe’
- The Biden White House mixed it up with not one but two autopens
- The Shakespeare National Trust determines that Shakespeare is ‘not to be’
- Carville tells Democrats to quit making asses of themselves
- About that Texas congressman who called the transgender member of Congress 'Mister' ...
- A federal district court judge erases Trump’s ability to rid the country of enemy aliens
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much