PrintMarch 22, 2012
When is race relevant to the New York Times?
Why is it that in its coverage today of the dead Muslim terrorist in France, the New York Times says only that he is a Frenchman that killed 7 people, with no indication whatsoever that he is of Arab descent? The very same paper, in covering the Sanford, Florida shooting of Trayvon Martin, mentions in the first paragraph that the victim is black, and in the first sentence of the third paragraph that the alleged shooter is a white Hispanic.
Curious, isn't it?
Hat tip: Jake Rosenfeld.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump and the Public Trust
- Trump’s First 100 Days: A Scorecard of Wins, Waits, and Wobbles
- Larry David: No Longer the Master of his Comedic Domain
- Mass deportations without ICE enforcement
- Harvard’s Tax-Exempt Status and Religion-Based Bequests
- The Net Neutrality Hydra: Twice Decapitated, Still Standing
- Cloward-Piven and the Migrant Invasion
- Acting on the Lessons of History
- Is Jamie Raskin Having a Psychotic Break?
- Mother or Monster?
Blog Posts
- Biden pops up at the pope's funeral, looking lost
- The mind-numbing, innovation-destroying DEI permeating Washington State government
- Leftism is killing chocolate
- Susan Rice: The thing that wouldn't go away
- Rebutting the fallacy that ICE needs a warrant to grab illegal aliens
- There’s been an official ‘War on Whiteness’ by groups such as HHS and others
- The entire Democrat party says leftist judges are above the law
- The real goal of Trump’s tariff war
- IRS firepower: Actions speak louder than words
- A new ‘spur-of-the-moment’ leftist protest planned for May Day!
- Ugly details rolling out on just what the Milwaukee judge did hands hyperventilating Democrats another losing cause
- Maybe woke has been "berry berry bad" to me?
- How much due process is due illegals?
- No Tesla or victim love in Minneapolis
- This is what happens when you tell people the law doesn’t apply to them