UN Official Questions Biofuel Commitment
The warmist fraud continues to unravel, with the impracticality of the biofuels program impressing even an important United Nations official. He is making a point that skeptics have reiterated for years now, but for the UN, any recognition of reality is to be applauded, no matter how tardy. AFP reports:
The UN special rapporteur on the right to food urged the EU for a rethink on biofuels Friday, saying huge errors had been committed in the initial enthusiasm for an alternative to harmful fossil fuels.
"The more biofuels the EU produces, the more it will be forced to import vegetable oils from the rest of the world," said Olivier De Schutter.
De Schutter's bureaucratic empire (the "right" to food!) tends to supply concerns, so he might have actually anticipated that taking cropland formerly devoted to food in order to produce energy would cause there to be less food available to feed human beings. If the EU decides to produce its own biofuels, it can import replacement food crops from Africa and elsewhere, countries whose inhabitants will suffer as market prices rise, and there is less food available overall to feed the local populace. They would then turn to the UN for help. So finally, someone in the organization connects the dots that any sensible person familiar with markets understood immediately.
Nonetheless, it is fair to say that the UN is becoming divided on one aspect of the warmist enterprise, biofuels. Even better, the UN is starting to realize that market consequences may be a valid reason to question the bon pensants when they try to save the world with a harebrained fraudulent scheme.
It is hard to sustain a massive fraud over a period of years.
Hat tip: A.P.E.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.