Hydrophophia
"EU says water is not healthy," declares a British headline.
Of course it does. After three years of exhaustive study, a well-pensioned panel of EU scientists has conclusively concluded that water purveyors cannot make the hare-brained claim that their product -- which is water, lest we lose sight of the puddle for the pond -- hydrates.
Once you've detached yourself that far from reality, you'll soon find yourself sinking inexorably beneath a rising tide of inane regulations. A few years back it was curly bananas that were EU-banned for being over-curly, unlike certain endive sprigs prettying up the plates at the quarterly regulator confab in Brussels, which curl precisely. Regulations are like magnetic flux: they will always curl to the left, try as you might to have it be otherwise.
This is the very essence, the eau de vie, of the undemocratic EU experiment. Euro-government has drifted so far from the ballot box that the governed have awoke to find the entire Rube-Goldberg apparatus tearing through the countryside mechanically unaware that it is consuming the very people it "serves."
"Oh, that's over there," you scoff. Americans retain control over their government, throwing the bums out from time to time. But do we?
80,000 pages of regulations were published last year at the Federal level, alone. That's just over 220 pages per day. An unknown number of these federal regulations specify penalties for non-compliance, up to and including jail time. Do any of them affect you? Are you sure? In reality, it is very likely you've already committed a federal crime or punishable infraction, and the day is young.
The American bureaucratic cartel may or may not have yet declared water "unhealthy" as have their EU brethren. Once I've paid a staff of attorneys to wade through this week's 1,534 pages and their implications for next week's proposals, I'll get back to you on whether or not your morning toilet flushed in the equatorially-correct and proscribed direction.
Much was made of the 2,300 pages in the Obamacare bill and how unreadable it was. What pikers: that's not even two week's worth of penumbra from our own bureaucracy.
Every day, you'd better be reading a short novel's worth of regulatory verbiage just to stay abreast of what you may or may not do. And, again, that's just the federal jurisdiction. Live in a State, County, City, or Town?

Uh-oh!
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Katherine Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot
- A visit to DOGE