June 30, 2010
House Passes DISCLOSE Act and Imperils Free Speech
How can 219 congressmen and women vote to trash the First Amendment? In passing H.R.5175, the majority in the House showed an egregious disregard for freedom of speech we have enjoyed until now. If the bill passes the Senate, enforcement can begin thirty days after the President signs it into law. Just in time for the 2010 elections.
From LifeSiteNews:
H.R. 5175, the "Democracy is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections (DISCLOSE) Act," which the National Right to Life Committee, other pro-life, pro-family groups, and even the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have condemned as a threat to free speech and free participation in the political process.[snip]The bill requires that every time an organization runs a campaign ad, its CEO must appear in the ad and twice state his name and the organization's name. The top five funders of the organization behind the ad - even if they had nothing to do with the ad's funding - must also have their names listed in the ad.
Here's a breakdown of the winners:
Large 501(c)4 groups - like the 4 million strong NRA and 750,000 member Sierra Club
Unions. Most union dues are under $600 dollars, and so do not have to be reported.
Union to union money transfers do not have to be reported.
Traditional media organizations like newspapers and television stations are exempt.
And the losers:
Most 501(c)4, 501(c)5, 501(c)6, and 527 groups - would have to list all donors of $600 or more with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
Bloggers, the vanguard of the "new media."
It's obvious the NRA backed the bill in a trade for keeping their Second Amendment rights, which the Supreme Court just enhanced in the form of extending gun laws to states.
At this point, the congressional progressives appear willing to throw some of their own under the bus -- ACLU, and other liberal outlets -- to satisfy the bigger picture of chipping away at conservative votes come November.
Those hurt the most will be conservative organizations that already operate on extremely tight budgets. As for conservative bloggers, the Left has had us in their crosshairs for a long time. The bill has far reaching effects "by potentially allowing the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to regulate political speech on the Internet. " So, don't be surprised when the penalties will be so high that we'll shut up and go away.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Katy Perry, Astronautesse and Unifying Force
- Small Business and Cybersecurity
- No One Is Above the Law—Including Letitia James
- Ready for Your Home to Become a Government School?
- Iran and the Failure of Collective Security
- Pam Bondi and the Genesis of Black Lives Matter
- Bill Maher Dines with Trump
- A ‘Hands Off’ Revealed Lots Of Anger But Not Much Coherent Thought
- Trump’s National Security Emergency Investigation Into Election Fraud Is Ongoing
- The Left’s Class Action Coup Against Immigration Law
Blog Posts
- Kilmar Abrego Garcia: The hand of Soros in the left's lionization of this illegal?
- In maniacally woke Britain, the Supreme Court recognizes biological sex
- A deplorable explains the animosity for Trump as he cleans up Biden’s messes
- Karmelo Anthony is OJ Simpson all over again
- We should beware of terrorists in suits and ties
- Karmelo Anthony’s family starts selling merch, and his fixer pushes ‘celebrity’ status with a bizarre social media video
- Harvard tells Trump to give it money or it’ll shoot the monkey
- Democrats infatuated with criminals and gang members — American citizens? Not so much
- Media scream: ‘Trump is coming for your coffee!’
- Exactly how hard do we want our legislatures to work?
- Rubio brings free speech back to foreign (and domestic) policy
- The erasure of Easter
- Red states rising
- Senator Van Hollen should get some tips from Bukele about keeping Baltimore safe
- Troll: Trump releases docs on foreign gang member a primping senator is trying to bring back from foreign prison