« Princeton professor: 'I ought to torture a terrorist' to save New York | The human capacity for innovation is limitless »
November 1, 2009
Even with Dede withdrawal, race is still tight
Inside the Siena poll numbers that shows Hoffman and Owens neck and neck in NY23 is some potential sobering news for Hoffman fans; Scozzafava supporters like Obama more than they do Hoffman.
Nate Silver:
Certainly, the conventional wisdom would be that when the Republican candidate suspends her campaign and encourages her supporters to vote for someone else, it would help the Conservative candidate more than the Democrat. And that's where the betting is on Intrade, where Conservative Doug Hoffman has shot up from having a 50 percent chance of winning NY-23's special election to a 67 percent chance on the news this morning.The reality may be more complicated.Consider the Siena poll out this morning, which has all sorts of useful cross-tabs. Scozzafava's supporters in this poll:-- Have a favorable view of Barack Obama by a 64-31 margin.
-- Have an unfavorable view of Hoffman 15-57.
-- Have an unfavorable view of Democrat Bill Owens, 19-50.[...]
If I had to guess, I'd think that of Scozzafava's support, one-quarter of people don't vote, one-quarter vote for Scozzafava anyway, 30 percent defect to Hoffman and 20 percent defect to Owens. Extrapolating from the morning's Siena poll, that would produce a result of Hoffman 43, Owens 42, Scozzafava 5, with 10 percent of the voters still up for grabs.Gun to my head? Sure, I'd take Hoffman at this point. But I'd also take the short side of the 67 percent odds that he's been given at Intrade.
Nate's analysis is, as always, insightful, logical, and based on sound reasoning. But he is ignoring the "X" factor; conservative enthusiasm for Hoffman that far exceeds any comparable excitement for Owens.
And in a low turnout election, that enthusiasm may very well give Hoffman the boost he needs to win.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Scandals, the Bubblegum Pink Resistance, and Lawfare
- How Instant Gratification Kills America
- The Grand Prince of Kyiv?
- The Law v. The Church
- Laurel Libby Fights for Girl's Sports
- Without God, There is No TRUE Respect for Human Life
- Revisiting a Forgotten History of Christian Political Activism
- The Upside Of A Terminal Illness
- Can You Trust that Airplane?
- Closing the DoE
Blog Posts
- Trump’s defunding Columbia is great, but all academia is riddled with ideological madness
- Bill Murray was right: The Washington Post framed Richard Nixon
- The China Connection?
- Elon Musk’s Rogan interview was a masterclass on illegal immigration
- Musk meetings with cabinet could be key to DOGE success
- Today in Insanity: Three preposterous stories
- Trump brings sanity to Russia and Ukraine
- Still cheering that speech about the evil ones
- Rescuing astronauts who aren't stranded in space
- A trans compromise
- There’s a new sheriff in town — and he’s taking no prisoners.
- So-called ‘Gender affirming’ surgery is bad for people’s happiness
- Stacey Abrams takes a page from Hugo Chavez on the matter of home appliances
- After Trump's speech, they can’t get there from here
- In San Francisco, a bathhouse gets grief for trying to have a ‘phallus free’ environment