October 17, 2009
Osama bin Laden, family man
Andrew Neatty of AFP previews a book to be published at the end of the month, written by his first wife and her son, revealing something of the personal side of the man. This is one angry, mean, cruel man. Not just to infidels. Some highlights:
Soon after, bin Laden began to travel to Pakistan and Afghanistan to fight against the Soviet occupation, returning to tell his sons tales of battles in Afghan caves and mountains under Soviet fire.He eventually returned to Saudi Arabia a hero, but at home was increasingly disciplinarian, punishing his children -- who eventually numbered more than a dozen -- for transgressions such as "showing too many teeth" while laughing.Meanwhile, Najwa was kept in seclusion with Osama's new wives, one of whom she picked, in a spartan home without the mod-cons that make life in the stifling desert lands of Saudi Arabia and Sudan more comfortable."My father would not allow my mother to turn on the air conditioning that the contractor had built into the apartment building," Omar relayed."Neither would he allow her to use the refrigerator that was standing in the kitchen."Despite this aversion to modern appliances, bin Laden indulged in his penchant for fast cars, including at least one gold-colored Mercedes. He once even bought a speed boat."Nothing gave him more satisfaction than having a full day to take a speedy drive to the desert, where he would leave his automobile while he took long walks," said Najwa.
None of this is exactly surprising. But keep in mind this man is highly regarded among millions of Muslims around the world. I wonder how far he is outside the norms of Saudi life?
I spent decades of my life around feminist intellectuals in Cambridge and Berkeley, women (and a few men) who loved to describe the patriarchy they saw all around them, that turned affluent, educated women into victims. By patriarchy, they meant the United States.
Osama bin Laden demonstrates what a real patriarchy is like. Funny that not many feminists are ardent supporters of the war on terror. For some reason, they prefer to avert their eyes.
Hat tip: Carol Brown
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Democrats Descend into Madness
- The Supreme Court Just Greenlit a $2 Billion USAID Power Grab
- The Enduring Battle Over ‘Merit’
- Who Is Andrew Tate and Why Is The President Trying to Protect Him?
- Trump Has Cornered the Market on ‘Hope and Change’
- The Peril of Modern Entanglements
- An End to Cynicism
- Democrats -- And Their Media -- Prove That They’re The Enemies Of The People
- Make Alberta America
- The Trump Speech and the Conservative Mandate
Blog Posts
- ActBlue, the Democrat party’s fundraising engine, is in deep trouble
- Georgetown Law's wokester dean mouths off to Trump DoJ attorney to hire his DEI graduates
- Not my circus, not my monkey: Kabuki theatre in the nation's capital and beyond
- Democrats: The Huskies of politics
- The ‘Progressive Party’ needs a new GPS
- Tantalizing Tidbits: Five more recent news stories in short form
- The most shockingly ‘generous’ government worker pension plan in the USA
- Vampires or voters? Or both?
- The (huge) hidden benefits of DOGE’s work
- Middle East peace proposal: Make Gaza a protectorate
- Trump gets what America is about
- A welcome break from Biden’s Justice Department
- Who wins in a tariff war?
- Impeaching rogue judges will be a hard row to hoe
- The SCOTUS a little more than half-nuts