PrintSeptember 5, 2009
'Which part of the Constitution says you get to take over health care?'
A pointed, intelligent question asked by an individual belonging to one of the "fascist mobs" of "crazies" at a health care town hall sponsored by Representative Mark Warner:
Allah at Hot Air has some trenchant thoughts:
We've been down this road before but it's one thing to kick around arguments in the comments and another to watch a U.S. Senator be put on the spot. Warner's argument won't appeal to strict constructionists - he concedes that there's no health-care power, just like there's no education power - but from a practical standpoint he's right that this ship has already sailed. Through the Commerce Clause all things are possible, my friends.
There have been 220 years of court cases where the Constitution has been expanded, stretched, folded, and twisted to achieve some social or economic end. Of course, the Founders never intended that to happen - one reason Jefferson and others did not support it, especially the idea of a Supreme Court.
But the body of law that has been built up around the Commerce clause cannot easily be repealed without the entire rickety structure coming down around us. The law is a "thicket" as Thomas More said. How true. The branches intertwine, melding the good with the bad so that cutting through the morass would serve only to bring down those laws that are necessary along with those that are a problem.
No easy answers. But then, democracy is not supposed to be easy. All we can do is work to inform voters so that we end up electing politicians who appoint judges who are more enamored of upholding the law than in making it.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
- Tariffs and the Moral High Ground
- ‘Mahmoud Khalil, Who Are You?’
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
Blog Posts
- The Biden White House mixed it up with not one but two autopens
- The Shakespeare National Trust determines that Shakespeare is ‘not to be’
- Carville tells Democrats to quit making asses of themselves
- About that Texas congressman who called the transgender member of Congress 'Mister' ...
- A federal district court judge erases Trump’s ability to rid the country of enemy aliens
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much
- Bacha Bazi still being practiced in Afghanistan; young boys sexually abused
- UN judge convicted of forcing a woman into indentured servitude
- What are capital gains, really?
- Trump begins restoring law and order
- Purge the poison: End Middle East Studies
- The Godfather: 53 and getting better all the time
- Why aren't Johnny and Suzie reading?
- ActBlue smurfs its way to oblivion
- Hunter Biden hotfoots it to a luxury vacation in South Africa, seemingly to avoid a deposition on his claimed poverty